In American Family v. Cintas, the Wisconsin Supreme Court enforced an indemnification provision under Ohio law. Kevin Long and Lars Gulbrandsen discuss the decision and its impact.

Wisconsin Act 235 made comprehensive changes to the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure. Lauren Triebenbach discusses these changes, which apply to causes of action filed on or after July 1, 2018.

Private Public Partnerships (P3) involves alternative procurement methodologies, public/private financing mechanisms, enabling legislation, and contracts for the all of the above, as well as ongoing maintenance and operations of the facilities involved. Carrie Cox discusses the continuing emergence of P3 and the challenges inherent in P3 work.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court seems to have settled for now the question of whether attorney fees are recoverable in a statutory theft by contractor case. Mark Schmidt discusses the court’s decision.

While a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision may appear to weaken the statute of repose governing construction projects, attorneys should thoroughly analyze all the issues before deciding if a construction claim is timely. Brian Smigelski discusses the effect of the decision in Wosinski v. Advanced Cast Stone Co.

When must a dispute be arbitrated, and who decides? Matthew McClean discusses lessons learned from a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals case that went to arbitration to determine whether the case was properly in arbitration.

Employers with apprentices may receive as much as 2 percent credit – or up to $2,500 – on their Worker’s Compensation Premiums, effective Oct. 1, 2018.

The final price of a construction project is difficult to determine – and must be done before the contract is signed. Saul Glazer discusses the methods to determine that final price – and avoid serious issues that may arise when the price is incorrect.

The 2017-2019 Wisconsin budget eliminates the state’s prevailing wage and institutes tax relief measures that benefit the construction industry. John Schulze discusses these and other significant construction-related initiatives recently signed into Wisconsin law.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ dismissal of a copyright claim against a homebuilder sends message of increased scrutiny to copyright “trolls.” Eric Meier discusses the decision and what it means for designers of single family home plans.

Construction involves plenty of risk to all parties involved. While Wisconsin has barred “pay if paid” clauses in some circumstances, it is by no means an absolute bar. James Dash and Bryce Cox advise not to assume that all such clauses are unenforceable – and to negotiate accordingly.

Wisconsin’s economic development future is forever changed as the WEDC embarks on its first “Megadeal,” says Cynthia Buchko. She outlines the details of legislation authorizing $3 billion in taxpayer-funded incentives for the development of an advanced manufacturing facility by FoxConn.

Two proposed state Assembly bills would significantly impact how public works contracts are awarded. Patrick Whiting reviews how construction contracts are awarded in Wisconsin, and outlines the changes in the proposed bills.

In June 2010, a young man was killed when a 13-ton concrete panel fell onto him in Milwaukee. The case is the basis for a recent Court of Appeals decision regarding statute of repose’s concealment exception. Hugh Anderson discusses the case and the nature of the evidence presented to establish the exception.

Steven Mroczkowski discusses a recent ruling in District II Court of Appeals that is a reminder for attorneys to emphasize to clients the importance of clear communication during projects, and that a review of title records prior to filing a lien may be prudent when ownership is not abundantly clear.

Wisconsin appellate courts have remained silent on the Spearin Doctrine, leaving open the question: how will our courts respond to a claim for recovery under this theory? A little used 100-year old doctrine could be the key, says Lauren Triebenbach.

In a recent decision, Wisconsin’s Supreme Court reiterated that private contractors may be immune from damages caused by implementing the plans and specifications provided by a governmental entity. "The decision provides a useful reminder that a private contractor may be able to benefit from the governmental entity’s immunity,” writes Chase Horne.

Mark Schmidt discusses the background and current status of a case now before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. “This case could have a big impact on claims for theft by contractor,” he writes.

With many collective bargaining agreements typically three years long, many employers and unions will head to the bargaining table this year for the first time under Right to Work. Krista Ebbens answers questions about the issues employers face under Right to Work.

A recent decision by a Milwaukee Circuit Court judge serves as guidance to plaintiffs in the future that defendant-specific expert testimony is crucial to establishing negligence on the part of design professionals for construction defects. Brian Smigelski discusses the decision and its impact.

To properly apply prevailing wage rates and hours, lawyers need to understand the nuances of mineral aggregates and material processing in state highway projects. Carrie Cox provides a starting point and guidance to ensure employers comply with the law.

Companies working on public projects need to remain vigilant regarding changes to Wisconsin’s revised Prevailing Wage Law. Carrie Cox identifies the changes to the law now in effect.

Cameron Smith talks about a recently argued Wisconsin Supreme Court case – Melchert v. Pro Electric Contractors. “The case gives the Court the opportunity to expound on two key aspects of immunity from liability for government contractors,” Smith writes.

Projects involving Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) can be challenging for contractors and non-DBE subcontractors. The Seventh Court’s decision implies that, for the foreseeable future, the law is settled that DBEs are found constitutional when tied to federal funds.

You are a construction contractor who has been tendered the defense of an action pursuant to an indemnity clause in your contract. The recent pithy and instructive Aug. 9, 2016 Court of Appeals decision in Karen Colleran v. Erik C. Wildes is asharp warning; it illustrates the pitfalls if you and your insurer fail to respond correctly.

Whether or not you like the economic loss doctrine, in construction circumstances it appears here to stay – after a recent and well-reasoned decision in Milwaukee County Circuit Court regarding Wis. Stat. section 895.447.

Can the statute of repose still be used to bar cases from moving forward to trial as the law intended, or has the law lost its force? Matthew McClean discusses recent appellate cases applying Wisconsin’s construction statute of repose.

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on the application of promissory estoppel in the context of construction bidding. At issue is the impact of bid negotiations upon the general contractor’s ability to assert promissory estoppel where a subcontractor later declines or refuses to honor its bid.

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals faced the issue of whether a lender’s title insurance policy covers construction liens that arise from the lender’s decision to cease funding its construction loan due to a loan imbalance.

The Construction and Public Contract Law Section has established this blog to provide its members with valuable information concerning issues that are important to attorneys engaged in construction or public contracting law.