 Wisconsin Lawyer
Wisconsin Lawyer
Vol. 78, No. 11, November 
2005
Lawyer Regulation System Composition
The composition and organization of the 
lawyer regulation system is depicted in Figure 1. Following is a 
description of the components.
Wisconsin Supreme Court. The supreme court 
supervises the lawyer regulation system, determines attorney misconduct 
and medical incapacity, and imposes discipline or directs other 
appropriate action in proceedings filed with the court.
Office of Lawyer Regulation. The Office of Lawyer 
Regulation (OLR) consists of the director, investigative and support 
staff, litigation counsel, and retained counsel. The OLR:
- receives and responds to inquiries and grievances relating to 
attorneys;
- investigates allegations of attorney misconduct and medical 
incapacity;
- diverts matters into an alternatives to discipline program;
- prosecutes misconduct and medical incapacity proceedings; and
- investigates license reinstatement petitions.
District Committees. District committees exist in 
each of the 16 State Bar districts and consist of lawyers and public 
members appointed by the supreme court. Under the supervision of the 
director, district committees:
- educate the bar and the public about the legal profession and the 
ethical practice of law;
- refer to the director possible misconduct or medical incapacity 
matters;
- assist in the investigation of possible misconduct or medical 
incapacity;
- recommend to the director the appropriate disposition of matters 
they investigate;
- monitor an attorney's participation in an alternatives to discipline 
program or an attorney's compliance with conditions on practice; 
and
- assist in resolving minor disputes between an attorney and a 
client.
Preliminary Review Committee. The Preliminary Review 
Committee consists of 14 members, nine lawyers and five public members 
appointed by the court. The committee is comprised of two seven-member 
panels, each having at least four lawyers and at least two public 
members. The panels:
- review the results of OLR and District Committee investigations and 
determine whether there is cause to proceed in the matter;
- review, upon request by a grievant, decisions by the director to 
dismiss a grievance after investigation; and
- confer with the Board of Administrative Oversight and suggest 
improvements in the operation of the committee and its panels.
Board of Administrative Oversight. The Board of 
Administrative Oversight consists of 12 members, eight lawyers and four 
public members appointed by the court. The board:
- monitors the system's fairness, productivity, effectiveness, and 
efficiency;
- monitors new procedure implementation;
- assesses public and bar perceptions of the system's integrity;
- reports its findings to the supreme court;
- reviews the system's operation with the court and files an annual 
report;
- proposes substantive and procedural rules;
- informs and educates the public and bar about the system; and
- proposes an annual budget.
Special Investigative Panel. The Special 
Investigative Panel is composed of lawyers appointed by the supreme 
court who are not currently participating in the lawyer regulation 
system. The director refers allegations of misconduct against attorneys 
currently participating in the system to a special investigator. In a 
referred matter, the special investigator performs the functions that 
the director would normally perform, which may include evaluating, 
investigating, dismissing, diverting, or prosecuting the matter.
Special Preliminary Review Panel. The Special 
Preliminary Review Panel is composed of four lawyers and three public 
members appointed by the supreme court. In matters involving allegations 
against current participants in the lawyer regulation system, the panel 
reviews the special investigator's decision to close a matter without 
investigation or dismiss a matter after investigation, and reviews an 
investigative report to determine whether there is cause to proceed.
Referees. Referees are attorneys or reserve judges 
appointed by the supreme court to:
- conduct hearings in proceedings alleging misconduct or medical 
incapacity;
- conduct hearings on petitions for license reinstatement;
- review consensual public or private reprimands submitted by the 
director; and
- review, upon the request of a grievant, determinations by 
Preliminary Review Panels of no cause to proceed.
Wisconsin 
Lawyer