Sign In
    Wisconsin Lawyer

Features

The first year of the second Trump administration, beginning in mid-January 2025, included notable developments in the areas of federal regulatory and enforcement actions. This article discusses some of the most significant developments for lawyers.
By Rebecca C. Furdek
Liability for governmental entities for safe-place-statute violations is unclear because of conflicting opinions from the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. The supreme court can restore harmony on the topic but only if and when it accepts review of a case involving a person injured in a public building owned by a governmental entity.
By John A. Becker
Lawyers advising clients on any matters involving THC beverages face challenges: not only determining whether THC beverages are lawful but also understanding how federal regulatory systems behave when Congress draws a bright statutory line and agencies must govern the shadows around it.
By Trent Kubasiak

Opinions, Voices & Ideas

  • President's Message
  • Challenge Your Opinions
  • Dan Gartzke says that it's always an appropriate time to question one’s own beliefs and opinions and, sometimes, to change them.
  • Your State Bar
  • Understanding the "And"
  • Jill Rothstein wonders if framing responses as "yes, and..." could strengthen connections that would help us see things differently and perhaps better understand one another.
  • Q&A Profile
  • Chad W. Koplien: Serving a Cause Bigger than Oneself
  • Koplien is grateful to the private sector for providing exposure to a wide variety of legal issues but has found gratification in his public servant role, which has allowed him to serve veterans in a cause bigger than himself.
  • Ethics
  • Speaking Publicly about Client Matters: Always Be Cautious
  • Dean Dietrich cautions lawyers to be reluctant to rely on the "impliedly-authorized" exception to the prohibition on revealing client information, especially if making comments on social media about a client's matter without the client's consent.
  • Technology
  • AI and Expert Witnesses: Not Replacement But a Strategic Imperative
  • Michael C. Maschke, Sharon D. Nelson, and John W. Simek explain that expert testimony often fails not because it is wrong but because it is incomprehensible. Lawyers who use AI thoughtfully can review more material, prepare more effectively, and present complex ideas more clearly.

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY