
Vol. 77, No. 4, April 
2004
Handle Personal Injury Practice with Care
Why is personal injury practice the source of one-fourth of legal 
malpractice claims? An experienced PI lawyer-turned claims counsel 
offers his insight.
 
by Ann Massie Nelson
Ann Massie 
Nelson is a regular contributor to Wisconsin Lawyer 
and communications director at Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance 
Co.
 
Like the proverbial fish that got away, the personal injury case that 
cannot be brought to trial because of the lawyer's negligence just grows 
bigger and better with time and retelling.
Very few personal injury claims result in a jury trial. Nearly all 
claims are settled through negotiation, mediation, or arbitration.
But the plaintiff who loses the opportunity to be heard in court 
because of the lawyer's error - real or perceived - will forever believe 
that his or her case was "the big one."
Juries, increasingly aware of exorbitant awards and dubious claims, 
have lowered average awards in recent years, particularly in cases 
involving soft-tissue injury claims, which are more difficult to 
value.
"You can tell clients that juries are not as sympathetic as in the 
past, but you always have uncertainty with a jury trial. The jury is the 
wild card," says Brian C. Anderson, who practiced personal injury law 
before joining Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. (WILMIC) as claims 
counsel.
Plaintiffs who aggressively pursue an injury claim can be equally 
aggressive in pursuing a legal malpractice claim when they are 
disappointed with the results, Anderson says.
Personal Injury is Highest Risk Area
Statistics kept by the National Legal Malpractice Data Center show 
that legal malpractice claims arising out of personal injury practice 
account for about one-fourth of claims made against lawyers, more than 
those arising from any other single area of practice.
WILMIC's claims experience mirrors that of insurers nationwide. Since 
1990, malpractice claims resulting from personal injury representation 
have comprised 24 percent of the claims made (frequency) and 33 percent 
of defense and indemnity dollars spent (severity).
According to Anderson, several common and often interrelated missteps 
factor into making PI practice high risk, including:
- Missed statutes of limitation. Failure to file a 
personal injury claim within the applicable statute of limitation is the 
most common error cited. "An injured person may treat for months or 
years. In the meantime, the plaintiff's lawyer waits to file the claim 
until the medical records and bills are in and the value of the injury 
claim is known. Sometimes the lawyer waits until the last day to file, 
then discovers a calendaring error," he says.
 
- Failure to recognize intermediate deadlines, such 
as those for naming expert witnesses, paying jury fees, or obtaining 
independent medical examinations. "Clients often have difficulty 
scheduling a vocational assessment or an appointment with a doctor to 
determine permanency. Without these expert reports, the client doesn't 
have a case," Anderson says. "If the case is dismissed, the client may 
blame the lawyer."
 
- Practicing out of jurisdiction. The statute of 
limitation for filing personal injury claims varies by state. For 
example, a person injured in Beloit, Wis., has three years from the date 
of the accident in which to file a claim, but someone injured across the 
border in South Beloit, Ill., has only two years. 
"Lawyers must ask clients exactly where and when the injury occurred. 
Then, they need to ask themselves if it is wise practice to take a case 
in a state where they are not licensed to practice law and cannot file a 
lawsuit," Anderson notes.
 
- Inadequate preparation. Personal injury claimants 
who advance to become legal malpractice claimants often say the lawyer 
did not adequately prepare the personal injury case. The client who 
doesn't want to pay for expert testimony or discovery in the underlying 
personal injury case may forget that the lawyer recommended these 
measures. "Wise lawyers document their advice to clients in writing, 
particularly when the client chooses to act otherwise," Anderson 
says.
 
- Unavailability of experts. Patients may see several 
different doctors or health care providers during a course of treatment, 
making it difficult for any one professional to become an expert on the 
plaintiff's case. Consulting fees of $500 an hour or more and 
unwillingness to testify or commit time further restrict access to 
expert testimony.
 
- Doctors' distrust of lawyers. Doctors often are 
wary of lawyers, whom they perceive as promoting medical malpractice 
claims and litigation. "The medical profession needs the legal 
profession, the legal profession needs the medical profession, and the 
clients need both professions," Anderson says. "Without a good working 
relationship between the two professions, the client suffers."
 
- Over-inflated expectations. Advertising by personal 
injury law firms and highly publicized awards have many people believing 
that filing a personal injury claim is an easy way to win big money. 
Clients need to hear early on that they will be required to undergo 
medical exams, complete paperwork, and testify at hearings or 
mediations. "They devote a considerable amount of time and effort with 
no guarantee of a good result. When they are disappointed with the 
verdict or settlement they receive, they often look for someone to 
blame," Anderson says.
 
- Tenuous attorney-client relationship. In some 
personal injury practices, the lawyer-client relationship is more akin 
to a blind date than a true relationship. Clients who choose their 
lawyer based on a yellow pages ad and don't meet him or her until 
moments before a hearing or mediation are unlikely to feel empathy when 
the lawyer makes a mistake.
 
- Lawyer's share or lion's share? If the lawyer's 
fees exceed the client's recovery, the client likely will be unhappy and 
resentful. "The client will say, 'I'm the one who's injured, but my 
lawyer made all the money,'" Anderson notes. In his private practice, 
Anderson discounted his fees when the client's net recovery was less 
than his fees.
 
- Dollars are not pain relievers. A settlement can 
compensate a plaintiff for financial loss, but the pain, physical 
limitations, and change in lifestyle as a result of a personal injury 
remain. Sometimes, people who are suffering lash out at any available 
target, including their lawyers who are attempting to help them.
 
Wisconsin 
Lawyer