
Vol. 75, No. 12, December 
2002
Budget Reform Bill Enacts Adoption and Safe Families Act
Changes to the Children's and Juvenile Justice 
codes harmonize Wisconsin law with the requirements of the Adoption and 
Safe Families Act. 
 
by Tony Jamieson
The State Budget Repair bill, now Wisconsin Act 109, deals primarily 
with state finances, but it also includes substantial changes to both 
chapters 48 and 938, respectively the Children's and Juvenile Justice 
codes. Most of the changes in Act 109 harmonize Wisconsin law with the 
requirements of the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). While the 
ASFA primarily has a fiscal focus, the changes in the Wisconsin Statutes 
may have a profound effect on everyday practice. The changes to chapters 
48 and 938 took effect on July 29, 2002.
This article focuses on a few of the more important changes; for 
specific changes affecting individuals' law practices, please read the 
act, available through the Internet.1
Changes Incorporate ASFA Factors
Many of the statutory changes incorporate the "ASFA factors." When 
the child is placed outside the home, AFSA factors require specific 
findings that: continued placement in the parental home is contrary to 
the child's welfare; the agency removing the child from the home has 
made reasonable efforts to prevent removal; and the agency has made 
reasonable efforts to make it possible to return the child safely home. 
In some instances, found at Wis. Stat. sections 48.355(2d)(b) and 
938.355(2d) (b) 1.-5., reasonable efforts are not required. The act 
amends the "not required" (NR) factors to require, in most cases, that 
the proof of a crime or aggravated factors be supported by a judgment of 
conviction.
Orders Must Document ASFA Factors
Throughout the act, the ASFA amendments specifically provide that 
orders "that merely reference" ASFA factors are insufficient to comply 
with the act's requirements - the order must document or reference 
specific information with regard to those factors.2
Custody Hearing. Sections 101b-g and 529b-h of the 
budget repair bill make several changes to the custody hearing statutes. 
At custody hearings, the court must make findings about the AFSA 
factors, or require the responsible agency to provide sufficient 
information to make that finding within five days of the order.
Petition. The changes made to Wis. Stat. sections 
48.255 and 938.255 now require that if a child is held in custody 
outside the home, the petition either needs to contain information 
regarding the ASFA and NR factors or a statement by the petitioner that 
the facts are not known or cannot be ascertained.3
Time Limits. Act sections 101k and 529m-n prohibit 
delays and continuances that result in AFSA factor findings being 
delayed more than 60 days after removal from the home or more than 12 
months after the reasonable efforts finding with regard to a permanency 
plan.
Consent Decrees. Act sections 101m and 529p-q 
require that if a child is placed outside the home or maintained in an 
out-of-home placement by the consent decree, the court must make the 
appropriate findings about ASFA and NR factors.
Court Reports. If a court report recommends 
placement outside the home, it must include specific information 
addressing the ASFA and NR factors.4
Dispositional Hearings. Act sections 101r and 529v 
require an agency recommending out-of-home placement to present evidence 
of "specific information" about the ASFA and NR factors.
Dispositional Orders. Act sections 101s-102cg and 
531d-533b govern dispositional orders. The court must make findings 
regarding the ASFA and NR factors. The NR subsection requires evidence 
of a final judgment of conviction.5
The potentially most dramatic change is that dispositional orders in 
chapter 48 and chapter 938 cases placing a child in a foster home, 
treatment foster home, group home, relative home, or residential care 
center shall now terminate at age 18, age 19 if the child is attending 
school, or one year after entry, whichever is later, unless the court 
specifies a shorter time.6 In-home 
placements are still capped at one year. Delinquency corrections orders 
are not significantly affected by the act.7
Change of Placement. The revisions to the 
change-of-placement statute also require the court to make findings 
regarding the ASFA and NR factors if the child is placed outside the 
home. If a change of placement is from in-home to out-of-home, the court 
is empowered under the statute to extend the dispositional order until 
age 18 or older.8 Changes of placement to 
correctional institutions are not significantly altered by the 
act.9
Foster Parents. Foster parents, among others, are no 
longer required to make their oral or written statements under 
oath.10
Extension. Act sections 102gf-hr and 533ct-dh govern 
extensions. The date the child was placed outside of his or her home is 
the date of first removal.11 In delinquency 
cases, if the child was first placed in detention, the date of the move 
from secure to nonsecure confinement governs.12
At extension hearings, the agency needs to provide specific 
information showing efforts to achieve the permanency plan's goals, and 
the court must make specific findings about reasonable efforts.13 An order under Wis. Stat. section 48.365 that 
continues placement in a nonsecure out-of-home setting may be until age 
18, age 19 if attending school, or one year after entry.14
Permanency Plans. The act makes many changes to the 
permanency planning section, expanding the cases in which plans are 
required. Plans must include specific school and medical information, a 
plan for ensuring the safety and appropriateness of the placement, a 
description of services to be provided to various parties, a specific 
statement of the goal of the permanency plan including a rationale for 
setting that goal, and transition plans for children 15 or older. Courts 
are required to hold hearings at least once every 12 months to review 
the plans.15
Tony Jamieson, U.W. 
1997 cum laude, is a Waukesha County assistant corporation counsel. His 
primary duties are prosecuting CHIPS, JIPS, and TPR cases. He is chair 
of the State Bar Children and the Law Section.
 
Sanctions. In delinquency and status offensecases, 
when the court orders a child into a place of nonsecure custody, the 
court must make findings, on a case-by-case basis, that the agency has 
made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the juvenile from the 
home and that continued placement in the home is contrary to the 
juvenile's welfare.16
In a nutshell, the changes involve the ongoing obligation of the 
departments and agencies to make the ASFA and NR factor inquiries and 
further require the courts to make the requisite findings. Attorneys 
should review Act 109 for any other changes that may specifically affect 
their individual practices.
Endnotes
1 2001 Wis. Act 109 can be accessed 
online at www.legis.state.wi.us.pdf. 
The changes to chapter 48 start at section 101b; the changes to chapter 
938 begin at section 529. The effective date section for Act 109 begins 
at section 9309.
2 See, e.g., 2001 
Wis. Act 109, § 101(f).
3 2001 Wis. Act 109, §§ 
101h-j, 529j-k.
4 Id., §§ 
101p-q, 529 r-t.
5 Id., §§ 
101x-z, 531p-532k.
6 Id., §§ 
102cg., 532t.
7 Id., §§ 
532v-533b.
8 Id., §§ 
102dg-gb, 533bf-cb, cp.
9 Id., §§ 
533cd-cn.
10 Id., §§ 
102em, 102gd, 533br, etc.
11 Id., § 
102gf.
12 Id., § 
533ct.
13 Id., §§ 
102gh, gm, gr; 533 cv, cz, db.
14 Id., §§ 
102hr, 533dh.
15 Id., §§ 
102j-102rm, 533dj-fb.
16 Id., § 
533bb.
Wisconsin 
Lawyer