Wisconsin Lawyer: President's Message: Open up the Supreme Court:

State Bar of Wisconsin

Sign In

Top Link Bar

    WisBar.org may be unavailable on February 21 starting at 5 p.m. until 9 p.m. for system maintenance.​​​​​​

News & Pubs Search


    President's Message: Open up the Supreme Court

    It's time for the Wisconsin Supreme Court to hold all its conferences in public - even those in contested appeals.

    Steve Levine

    Share This:

    Wisconsin LawyerWisconsin Lawyer
    Vol. 79, No. 12, December 2006

    Open Up the Supreme Court

    It's time for the Wisconsin Supreme Court to hold all its conferences in public -even those in contested appeals.

    by Steve Levine

    In the wake of the Watergate scandal of the early 1970s, states raced to pass laws that would make the world safer for democracy. Open meetings and open records laws were thought to be an antidote to corruption in government by providing "transparency" and by educating the public about the doings of its governmental officials. Wisconsin joined the movement in 1976 by creating Wis. Stat. sections 19.81-19.98 - Wisconsin's Open Meetings Law. Any new law has to be fleshed out by court decisions, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court joined the bandwagon with some strongly worded opinions extolling the virtues of open government for every thing from state agencies to municipalities - but not for itself.

    In 1980, an effort began to have the court itself meet in public when it conferred on what were called legislative issues - regulation of the Bar, rules of professional conduct, any decision not made in a contested appeal. After 15 years of resistance, the court agreed to experiment with open conferences in 1995 and then made the change permanent a year later. Today, after every public hearing on rulemaking matters, the court's conferences are held right in the courtroom, open to the public. Open rulemaking conferences have become an integral part of the court's decision-making process. Now it's time for the court to open its doors all the way by holding all its conferences in public, including those involving contested cases. To maximize public access, the conferences should be broadcast by the new WisconsinEye public television network and via the Internet.

    While other public bodies make law by approving statutes, ordinances, and resolutions, the Wisconsin Supreme Court makes law by deciding cases. Opening the court's conferences on contested cases would educate both lawyers and the public in general about how the process works. And it would provide voters with a better basis for making choices in supreme court elections. Given some of the complaints we heard during the 1990s about incivility during court conferences, opening them to the public might improve the environment and enhance the public's confidence in its legal system. Open conferences are worth a try, so here is a formal request to the supreme court to open all its conferences to the public for a one-year test period. Try it; you may like it.

    Is there a down side to opening up all supreme court conferences? Would justices play to the cameras, or conversely, would open meetings stifle free and full debate and discussion? I haven't seen either during the court's open rulemaking conferences, and I haven't seen that at the state Public Service Commission, where contested cases have been decided in public since right after the Open Meetings Law was passed. It may happen, but we won't know unless the court gives it a try.

    It took 15 years for the supreme court to open its rulemaking conferences, so opening the rest of them won't happen overnight. But we can all help by writing or emailing the court urging it to do so. (The best time to do this is right before your next supreme court argument - a sure guarantee of winning your case.) The Wisconsin Legislature can pitch in by offering financial incentives in the court's next budget or by sponsoring a constitutional amendment requiring the court to open all its conferences. Perhaps the best way would be for a candidate to raise the issue in a supreme court election. (You may wish to ask the candidates in next April's race where they stand on the issue.) The public may not be that interested in joint and several liability, but it certainly understands the importance of open government.

    Please feel free to contact me at net steven.levine charter charter steven.levine net.