On Nov. 21 the FDIC clarified the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program to include Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts. Consistent with its mission to ensure stability in the banking community, the FDIC has acted to protect client funds and assure continued funding for programs that provide legal aid to poor people when economic uncertainties make the need for legal guidance most critical. As a result of this action, an individual client’s funds deposited in IOLTA are fully insured regardless of the amount.
 Wisconsin 
  Lawyer
Wisconsin 
  Lawyer
  Vol. 81, No. 12, December 
2008
FDIC includes IOLTA in unlimited deposit insurance 
under temporary liquidity guarantee program
On Nov. 21 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) clarified 
the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program to include Interest on Lawyer 
Trust Accounts (IOLTA). Consistent with its mission to ensure stability 
in the banking community, the FDIC has acted to protect client funds and 
assure continued funding for programs that provide legal aid to poor 
people when economic uncertainties make the need for legal guidance most 
critical. As a result of this action, an individual client’s funds 
deposited in IOLTA are fully insured regardless of the amount.
"The WisTAF board has been watching this issue very carefully and has 
been attempting to disseminate accurate information to attorneys 
considering FDIC coverage of IOLTA trust accounts," says WisTAF board 
member John E. Bermingham, Oshkosh. "This ruling clarifies the 
protection available to individual clients within an attorney or law 
firm's IOLTA Trust account. I am pleased that our clients' funds are 
fully protected."
The ABA, working with state and local bar associations and individual 
lawyers nationwide, made a persuasive case to the FDIC why IOLTA funds 
must be included in the expanded insurance program. Had the FDIC failed 
to expand full coverage for IOLTA, lawyers would have had to consider 
abandoning IOLTA for fully insured non interest bearing accounts or 
moving IOLTA funds from community banks to the larger “too big to 
fail” banks. Abandoning IOLTA would have been catastrophic for 
IOLTA programs in all 50 states, which provide funding for legal aid for 
the poor. Moving the accounts to larger banks would have defeated the 
FDIC’s purpose in creating the TLGP.
FDIC Press 
Release and final rule
ABA 
Statement
Wisconsin 
Lawyer