Sign In
    Wisconsin Lawyer
    October 01, 2001

    Wisconsin Lawyer October 2001: Supreme Court Orders 2

     
    Wisconsin Lawyer October 2001

    Vol. 74, No. 10, October 2001

    Supreme Court Orders


    The Wisconsin Supreme Court sets a public hearing for Nov. 13 to consider: 1) petitions and amendments to the statutes to consolidate statutes that impose sanctions, 2) changes to the Supreme Court Rules regarding eligibility for appointment as guardian ad litem, and 3) changes to the statutes regarding publication of court of appeals opinions and regarding petitions for review.

    GAL appointment eligibility

    In the matter of the amendment of Supreme Court Rules chapter 35 - Eligibility for Appointment as Guardian Ad Litem

    Order 01-07

    On April 5, 2001, the Joint Legislative Council filed a petition seeking to amend Supreme Court Rule 35.01 and add 35.015 and 35.03(1m) relating to the eligibility and education requirements for appointment as guardian ad litem for a minor.

    IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on the petition shall be held in the Supreme Court Room in the State Capitol, Madison, Wis., on Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2001, at 9:30 a.m.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's conference in the matter shall be held promptly following the public hearing on rules petitions 01-07 and 99-07.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the hearing be given by a single publication of a copy of this order and of the petition in the official state newspaper and in an official publication of the State Bar of Wisconsin not more than 60 days nor less than 30 days before the date of the hearing.

    Dated at Madison, Wis., this 4th day of September, 2001.

    By the court:

    Cornelia G. Clark, Clerk of Supreme Court

    Petition 01-07

    The Joint Legislative Council, on the unanimous recommendation of the Special Committee on Guardians Ad Litem in Actions Affecting the Family, hereby petitions the court to amend SCR 35.01 and create SCR 35.015 and SCR 35.03 (1m) relating to eligibility for appointment as guardian ad litem for a minor.

    First, the amendments create new eligibility requirements for attorneys who accept appointments as a guardian ad litem in proceedings under ch. 767, Stats. As amended, the rules would require an attorney to have received six hours of approved guardian ad litem education during the combined continuing legal education reporting period and the immediately preceding reporting period. Three of the required six hours would be in family court guardian ad litem education, as described below. In addition, as under current rules, a court could also determine that an attorney is qualified for a guardian ad litem appointment. The provision under which an attorney may accept appointments if he or she had attended 30 hours of guardian ad litem education would, therefore, apply only to attorneys accepting guardian ad litem appointments in proceedings under ch. 48 or 938, Stats. This change is requested because the Special Committee concluded that attorneys practicing as guardians ad litem should receive ongoing relevant education in order to effectively represent the best interests of children in family law disputes.

    The second amendment would specify the elements of guardian ad litem education that an attorney acting as a guardian ad litem in family court must receive. The rationale for this change is that, due to the level of conflict in family law cases for which a guardian ad litem is appointed, the committee concluded that a guardian ad litem with knowledge about child development and family dynamics could better formulate a recommendation to serve a child's best interests.

    The committee requests that SCR 35.01 (intro.) be amended to read:

    Commencing on July 1, 1999, a lawyer may not accept an appointment by a court as a guardian ad litem for a minor in an action or proceeding under chapter 48, 767 or 938 of the statutes unless one of the following conditions has been met:

    The committee requests that SCR 35.015 be created to read:

    Commencing on July 1, 2002, a lawyer may not accept an appointment by a court as a guardian ad litem for a minor in an action or proceeding under chapter 767 of the statutes unless one of the following conditions has been met:

    (1) The lawyer has attended 6 hours of guardian ad litem education approved under SCR 35.03 during the combined current reporting period specified in SCR 31.01 (7) at the time he or she accepts an appointment and the immediately preceding reporting period. At least 3 of the 6 hours shall be family court guardian ad litem education approved under SCR 35.03 (1m).

    (2) The appointing court has made a finding in writing or on the record that the action or proceeding presents exceptional or unusual circumstances for which the lawyer is otherwise qualified by experience or expertise to represent the best interests of the minor.

    The committee requests that SCR 35.03 (1m) be created to read:

    (1m) The board of bar examiners shall approve courses of instruction or continuing legal education activities as family court guardian ad litem education that are on the subject of proceedings under chapter 767 of the statutes; child development and the effects of conflict and divorce on children; mental health issues in divorcing families; the dynamics and impact of family violence; and sensitivity to various religious backgrounds, racial and ethnic heritages and issues of cultural and socio-economic diversity. The board of bar examiners may only approve courses of instruction or continuing legal education activities that are conducted after July 1, 2001.


Join the conversation! Log in to comment.

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY