 |
|
|
Vol. 73, No. 8, August 2000 |
Supreme Court Orders
 Previous
Page
COMMENT to Section 809.32: Titles and subtitles were added.
Subsection (1) was broken down into paragraphs (a) and (b). Subsection
(1)(a) was revised to specify that the no merit procedure applies
only to direct appeals. It also requires that the attorney certify
in the no merit report that the attorney has discussed the merits
of the appeal with the defendant, informed the defendant of the
no merit options and procedures, and that the defendant did not
consent to closing the file without further representation by
the attorney or that the defendant requested the submission of
a no merit report.
Subsection (1)(a) was also amended to allow the attorney
to reply to the defendant's response to a no merit report.
The rule allows the attorney to file a supplemental no merit
report and affidavit(s) disclosing information that is outside
the record and relevant to counsel's no merit determination
without violating confidentiality rules. The supplemental report
and affidavit procedure is in accordance with SCR 20:1.6(c)(1),
which allows disclosures of otherwise confidential communications
"to rectify the consequences of a client's criminal
or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer's
services had been used;" SCR 20:1.6(c)(2), which allows
disclosures "to establish a claim or defense on behalf of
the lawyer in a controversy between the lawyer and the client...or
to respond to allegations in any proceeding concerning the lawyer's
representation of the client;" and SCR 20:3.3, which requires
andor toward the tribunal. Service of the response by the clerk
on the attorney is necessary to ensure that the attorney receives
the defendant's response. Subsection (1)(b) requires the
attorney to certify in the no merit report that the attorney
discussed with the defendant all potential issues for appeal
and the defendant's options.
The second sentence in sub. (2) is new and requires the
attorney to notify the clerk, in the no merit notice of appeal,
of the time limit for filing the no merit report and the calculation
used to determine that time limit. The fourth sentence in sub.
(2) is new and requires the attorney to file a statement on transcript
with the clerk but exempts counsel from serving a transcript
on other parties. The fifth sentence in sub. (2) requires counsel
to serve copies of all other papers on the state.
Subsection (2)(a) is new and establishes the time limits
if a no merit report is not preceded by a postconviction motion.
The cross-reference was changed from s. 809.30(2)(g) to (e) because
only the original transcript and court record request triggers
the 180-day time limit.
Subsection (2)(b) is new and establishes the time limits
if a no merit report follows a postconviction motion.
The 10-day time limit in sub. (4) was changed to 14 days.
Please see the comment to s. 808.07. The time period for filing
the petition and supplemental petition may be affected by filing
of a motion for reconsideration in the court of appeals. See
s. 809.62(8).
SECTIONS 809.40(1) and (3) of the statutes are amended to
read:
809.40(1) An appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment
or order in a misdemeanor case, or a ch. 48, 51, 55 or, 938 or
980 case, or a motion for postconviction relief in a misdemeanor
case or any s. 971.17 proceeding must be initiated within
the time periods specified in s. 808.04 and is governed by the
procedures specified in ss. 809.30 to 809.32.
(3) Any civil appeal to the court of appeals under sub. (1)
or (2) is subject to the docketing statement requirement of s.
809.10(1)(a)(d) and may be eligible for the expedited
appeals program in the discretion of the court.
SECTION 809.40(4) of the statutes is created to read:
809.40(4) In chapter 48 and 938 cases, an order denying a
motion to suppress evidence or a motion challenging the admissibility
of a statement of the subject of the petition may be reviewed
upon appeal from a judgment even if the judgment was entered
upon an admission or a plea of no contest to the petition.
COMMENT to Section 809.40: Sub. (1) is amended to apply
to ch. 980 and s. 971.17 cases. The reference to misdemeanor
cases was deleted because it was redundant. No substantive change
was intended. Sub. (4) is new and allows suppression issues in
chs. 48 and 938 cases to be appealed under the same circumstances
available to defendants in criminal cases. See § 971.31(10).
SECTION 809.41(1), (2) (title), (3) (title) and (4) of the
statutes are amended to read:
809.41(1) (title) Motion for 3-judge panel. If an appellant
or a petitioner requesting the court to exercise its supervisory
jurisdiction or its original jurisdiction to issue prerogative
writs or its appellate jurisdiction to grant petitions for leave
to appeal desires the matter to be decided by a 3-judge panel,
the appellant or petitioner shall file with the copy of the notice
of appeal required by s. 809.10(1)(a) or with the petition requesting
the court to exercise its supervisory, original or appellate
jurisdiction a motion for a 3-judge panel. Any other party must
file a motion under this rule for a 3-judge panel within 10 14
days of service of the notice of appeal or with the response
to the petition. The failure to file a motion under this rule
waives the right to request the matter to be decided by a 3-judge
panel. A motion for a 3-judge panel in a case in which the state
is a party shall also be served upon the attorney general. The
attorney general may file a response to the motion within 7 11
days of after service.
(2) (title) Decision on motion for 3-judge panel.
(3) (title) 3-judge panel on court's own motion.
(4) (title) Motion for hearing in county of origin.
If an appellant desires that the appeal be heard in the county
where the case or action originated under s. 752.31(3), the appellant
shall file with the copy of the notice of appeal required by
s. 809.10(1)(a) a motion requesting a hearing in the county of
origin. Any other party must file a motion requesting a hearing
in the county of origin within 10 14 days of after
service of the notice of appeal. The failure to file a motion
under this rule waives the right to request the appeal be heard
in the county where the case or action originated.
COMMENT to Section 809.41: Titles were added. The time
limits in sub. (1) and sub. (4) have been changed from 7 to 11
and 10 to 14 days. See the comment to s. 808.07.
SECTION 809.43(1) and (2) of the statutes are amended to read:
809.43(1) A person shall who files a brief or appendix 8 10
copies with the court of a brief and appendix in the court
of appeals or such other the number as that
the court directs, and shall serve 3 copies on each party.
If the opposing party is not represented by counsel, only
one copy need be served on that party.
(2) A person who is found indigent under s. 814.29 and files
a brief or appendix and who is not represented by counsel
shall file the original and 2 copies with the court 3 copies
of a brief and appendix in the court of appeals and shall
serve one copy on each party. A prisoner who has been granted
leave to proceed without prepayment of fees under s. 814.29(1)(m)
and who is not represented by counsel shall file 3 copies of
a brief or appendix in the court of appeals and shall serve one
copy on each party.
COMMENT to Section 809.43: Subsection (1) was revised to
simplify statutory language. The last sentence in sub. (1) is
new and reduces the number of copies required for a pro se party.
Subsection (2) was revised to simplify the language and to specify
that this section applies only to pro se parties.
SECTION 809.50(1)(intro.), (2) and (3) of the statutes are
amended to read:
809.50(1) (intro.) A person shall seek leave of the court
to appeal a judgment or order not appealable as of right under
s. 808.03(1) by filing within 10 14 days of after
the entry of the judgment or order a petition and supporting
memorandum, if any. The petition and memorandum combined may
not exceed 35 pages if a monospaced font is used or 8,000 words
if a proportional serif font is used. The petition shall contain:
(2) An opposing party in the trial court shall file a response
with supporting memorandum, if any, within 10 14 days
of after the service of the petition. The response and
memorandum combined may not exceed 35 pages if a monospaced font
is used or 8,000 words if a proportional serif font is used.
Costs and fees may be awarded against any party in a petition
for leave to appeal proceeding.
(3) If the court grants leave to appeal, the procedures for
appeals from final judgments are applicable to further proceedings
in the appeal, except that the .The entry of the order
granting leave to appeal has the effect of the filing of a notice
of appeal. The court may specify the issue or issues that
it will review in the appeal.
COMMENT to Section 809.50: The time limits in subs. (1)
and (2) were changed from 10 to 14 days. Please see the comment
to s. 808.07. Subsection (3) specifies that the court may grant
discretionary review on specified issues. This rule codifies
Fedders v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 230 Wis. 2d 577, 601
N.W.2d 861 (Ct. App. 1999), which held a grant of leave to appeal
from a non-final order or judgment does not authorize cross-appeals
as of right from the same or from another non-final order or
judgment; cross-appeals require a separate petition for leave
to appeal.
SECTION 809.51(2) of the statutes is amended to read:
809.51(2) The court may deny the petition ex parte or may
order the respondents to file a response with a supporting memorandum,
if any, and may order oral argument on the merits of the petition.
The response and memorandum combined may not exceed 35 pages
if a monospaced font is used or 8,000 words if a proportional
serif font is used. The respondents shall respond with supporting
memoranda within 10 14 days of after service of
the order. A respondent may file a letter stating that he or
she does not intend to file a response, but the petition is not
thereby admtted.
COMMENT to Section 809.51: The time limit in sub. (2) was
changed from 10 to 14 days. See the comment to s. 808.07.
SECTION 809.60(1) and (2) of the statutes are amended to read:
809.60(1) A party may file with the supreme court a petition
to bypass the court of appeals pursuant to s. 808.05 no later
than 10 14 days following the filing of the respondent's
brief under s. 809.19 or response. The petition must include
a statement of reasons for bypassing the court of appeals.
(2) An opposing party may file a response to the petition
within 10 14 days of after the service of the petition.
COMMENT to Section 809.60: The time limits in subs. (1)
and (2) have been changed from 10 to 14 days. Please see the
comment to s. 808.07.
SECTION 809.62(3) and (4) of the statutes are amended to read:
809.62(3) Except as provided in s. 809.32(4) sub. (8),
an opposing party may file a response to the petition within
10 14 days of after the service of the petition.
(4) The petition for review and response, if any, shall
conform to s. 809.19(8)(b) and (d) as to form and certification
and, shall be as short as possible but and may not exceed
35 pages in length if a monospaced font is used or 8,000 words
if a proportional serif font is used, exclusive of appendix.
The petition for review and the response shall have a white
cover and a party shall file 10 copies with the clerk.
SECTION 809.62(8) of the statutes is created to read:
809.62(8) Filing of a motion for reconsideration pursuant
to s. 809.24 in the court of appeals tolls the time for filing
and responding to a petition for review pursuant to this section
or a petition or supplemental petition pursuant to s. 809.32(4),
and stays proceedings on any pending petition for review.
(a) If the motion for reconsideration is filed before any
petition for review, the 30-day time period to file the petition
and supplemental petition, if any, starts from the date of filing
of the order denying the motion, or the court of appeals'
amended decision or order.
(b) If a motion for reconsideration is filed, no party may
thereafter file a petition for review or supplemental petition
until the court of appeals files an order denying the motion
for reconsideration or an amended order or decision.
(c) If a motion for reconsideration is denied and a petition
for review had been filed before the motion for reconsideration
was filed, and if the time for filing a response to the petition
had not expired when the motion for reconsideration was filed,
a response to the petition may be filed within 14 days of the
order denying the motion for reconsideration.
(d) If a motion for reconsideration is denied and a petition
for review had been filed before the motion for reconsideration
was filed, and if the time for filing a supplemental petition
pursuant to s. 809.32(4) had not expired when the motion for
reconsideration was filed, the supplemental petition may be filed
within 14 days of the order denying the motion for reconsideration
or the time remaining to file the supplemental petition at the
time the motion for reconsideration was filed, whichever is greater.
(e) If the court of appeals files an amended decision or order
in response to the motion for reconsideration, any party who
filed a petition for review pursuant to sub. (1) or s. 809.32(4),
or a supplemental petition pursuant to s. 809.32(4) prior to
filing of the motion for reconsideration must file with the clerk
of the supreme court a notice affirming the pending petition
or supplemental petition, a notice withdrawing the pending petition
or supplemental petition, or an amendment to the petition for
review or supplemental petition within 14 days of the date of
filing of the court of appeals' amended decision or order.
Any other party may file a response within 14 days of filing
of the petitioner's notice or amendment.
COMMENT to Section 809.62: The time limit in sub. (3) has
been changed from 10 to 14 days. Please see the comment to s.
808.07. The last sentence of sub. (4) is new and specifies the
color of the cover that should accompany a petition for review
and the number of copies required.
Subsection (8) tolls the time for filing or responding
to a petition for review in the supreme court while a motion
for reconsideration of the same decision or order is pending
in the court of appeals, and stays supreme court consideration
of the petition for review while the motion for reconsideration
is pending. The time frames established for filing a petition,
supplemental petition, amendment to a pending petition and response
to a petition following resolution of a motion for reconsideration
are intended to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort for the
parties and the appellate courts, and minimize unnecessary expense.
Service requirements of s. 801.14(4) apply.
SECTION 809.64 of the statutes is amended to read:
809.64 Rule (Reconsideration) A party may seek reconsideration
of the judgment or opinion of the supreme court by filing a motion
under s. 809.14 for reconsideration within 20 days of the filing
date of the decision of the supreme court.
COMMENT to Section 809.64: This section has been changed
to specify that the time limit for filing motions for reconsideration
of supreme court opinions is calculated from the date, not the
filing, of the decision.
SECTION 809.70(2) of the statutes is amended to read:
809.70(2) The court may deny the petition or may order the
respondent to respond and may order oral argument on the question
of taking original jurisdiction. The respondent shall file a
response, which may be supported by a memorandum, within 10 14
days of after the service of the order.
COMMENT to Section 809.70: The time limit in sub. (2) was
changed from 10 to 14 days. Please see the comment to s. 808.07.
SECTION 809.80(1) of the statutes is amended to read:
809.80(1) A person shall file any paper required to be filed
by these rules with the clerk of the court, State Capitol,
Madison, Wisconsin 53702, unless a different place of filing
is expressly required or permitted by statute or rule. The
clerk of the court is located at 110 E. Main Street, Madison,
WI 53703. The mailing address for the clerk is P.O. Box 1688,
Madison, WI 53701-1688.
SECTION 809.80(3), (4) and (5) of the statutes are created
to read:
809.80(3) Filing of papers; use of mail.
(a) Filing may be accomplished by any method. Except as provided
in par. (b) and (c), filing is not timely unless the clerk receives
the papers within the time fixed for filing.
(b) A brief or appendix is timely filed, however, if on or
before the last day for filing, it is:
(i) deposited in the United States mail for delivery to the
clerk by first-class mail, or other class of mail that is at
least as expeditious, postage pre-paid; or
(ii) dispatched to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery
to the clerk within 3 calendar days.
(c) A brief or appendix from a person confined in an institution
is timely filed if the brief or appendix is deposited in the
institution's internal mailing system on or before the last
day for filing. A confined person who mails a brief or appendix
under this subsection shall also file a certification or affidavit
stating that first-class postage has been pre-paid and setting
forth the date on which the document was deposited in the mailing
system.
(4) Filing a petition for review. A petition for review
under s. 809.62 is timely filed only if the clerk actually receives
the petition within the time fixed for filing.
(5) Proof of filing date. (a) When a brief or appendix
is filed by mail or commercial carrier in accordance with s.
809.80(3)(b), the attorney or person filing the document shall
append an affidavit setting forth the date and manner by which
the document was mailed or dispatched.
(b) The date shown on a private postage meter does not establish
that the document was mailed on that date.
COMMENT to Section 809.80: Subsection (1) was amended to
provide the correct address of the clerk of the supreme court
and court of appeals.
Subsections (3) through (5) are new, and are taken largely
from Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 25. Under the
former rules, a brief was not filed until it was physically received
by the clerk, regardless of when the brief may have been mailed.
Because a party outside the Madison area had to allow time for
the postal or courier delivery, briefing periods were often adversely
affected merely to ensure that a brief was actually received
by the clerk before the expiration of the filing deadline.
Subsection (3)(a) retains the general rule that a document
is not filed until it is received by the clerk. However, subsection
(3)(b) creates an exception for briefs and appendices that are
filed with the clerk. For those documents, a filing will be considered
timely if, on or before the deadline, the brief or appendix is
either: (a) deposited in the United States mail for delivery
by first-class mail, or other class of mail at least as expeditious,
postage pre-paid, or (b) dispatched to a commercial delivery
service for delivery within 3 calendar days. When a brief or
appendix is mailed or sent by commercial courier, subsection
(5) requires that the party also file an affidavit of mailing
stating the date of mailing or dispatch. Subsection (3)(c) addresses
briefs and appendices filed by confined persons. For confined
persons, a brief or appendix will be timely filed if, on or before
the deadline, the brief or appendix is deposited in the institution's
internal mailing system, postage pre-paid. In addition, confined
persons are required to include a certification or affidavit
stating the date on which the brief or appendix was deposited
in the institution's mailing system.
Rule 809.80(4) reiterates the long-standing rule that a
petition for review filed with the clerk of the supreme court
must be actually received by the clerk on or before the last
day of the filing period. The timely filing of a petition for
review is necessary to invoke the supreme court's appellate
jurisdiction. See First Wis. Nat'l Bank of Madison v.
Nicholaou, 87 Wis. 2d 360, 274 N.W.2d 704 (1979). The exception
in sub. (3) does not apply to the filing of a petition for review
under s. 809.62. The requirement of service on other parties,
found in s. 801.14(4), is not affected by these amendments to
s. 809.80.
SECTION 809.81(2) of the statutes is amended to read:
809.81 (2) Number of copies. An original and 4 Five
copies in the court of appeals, an original and 8 9 copies in
the supreme court. A party shall file an original and 2 and
3 copies of a motion filed under s. 809.14 in the court of appeals
when if the appeal or other proceeding is one of the types
of cases specified in s. 752.31(2).
SECTION 809.81(8) of the statutes is created to read:
809.81(8) Confidentiality. Every notice of appeal or other
document that is filed in the court and that is required by law
to be confidential shall refer to individuals only by their first
name and the first initial of their last name.
COMMENT to Section 809.81: Subsection (2) was amended to
eliminate the distinction between "original" and "copy,"
because current technology produces copies of quality as good
as the original. Subsection (8) is new and requires that only
the first name and last initial be used in all documents in confidential
cases.
SECTION 809.82(2)(d) is created to read:
(d) Service of copy. A copy of any motion to enlarge time
limits under s. 809.82(2) shall be served on the clerk of the
circuit court.
COMMENT to Section 809.82: Subsection (2)(d) was created
to provide notice to the clerk of any motion affecting time limits.
SECTION 809.83(2) of the statutes is amended to read:
809.83(2) Noncompliance with rules. Failure of a person to
comply with a court order or with a requirement of these
rules, other than the timely filing of a notice of appeal or
cross-appeal, does not affect the jurisdiction of the court over
the appeal but is grounds for dismissal of the appeal, summary
reversal, striking of a paper, imposition of a penalty or costs
on a party or counsel, or other action as the court considers
appropriate.
COMMENT to section 809.83: Subsection (2) is changed to
allow appellate courts to sanction parties who violate court
orders.
Respectfully Submitted:
Judicial Council
By James C. Alexander
Procedure
to Suspend Law License for
Noncompliance of Child and Family Support Orders,
Subpoenas, Warrants
In the Matter of the Adoption of a Procedure to Refuse to
Grant or to Suspend the License to Practice Law of a Person Certified
under Wis. Stat. § 49.857 to be Delinquent in Payment of
Support or in Noncompliance with a Support or Paternity Subpoena
or Warrant
Order 00-05
In 1997, responding to federal legislation that addressed
enforcement of child and family support and other payments related
to the support of a child or former spouse, the Wisconsin Legislature
enacted Wis. Stat. § 49.857 to provide for the denial,
nonrenewal, restriction and suspension of licenses of persons
certified to be delinquent in making court-ordered payments of
support or failing to comply with a subpoena or warrant relating
to paternity or support proceedings. That statute provides, in
part, that the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
(DWD) enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Supreme
Court, with the court's agreement, that includes, among
other things, a procedure by which the court would suspend an
attorney's license to practice law or refuse to grant bar
admission to an applicant if the attorney or applicant is certified
to be delinquent in making court-ordered support payments or
failing to comply with a subpoena or warrant.
The court is considering the advisability of establishing
such a procedure by court rule, as well as the underlying issue
of whether the relationship between an attorney's delinquency
or noncompliance in support matters and the attorney's fitness
to practice law is such as to warrant the court's involvement
in the matter. If the court determines it advisable to establish
a procedure, following is one procedure it is considering, but
is not proposing, and on which it is soliciting public comment.
SECTION 1. 10.03(2) of the supreme court rules be amended
to read:
(2) Enrollment. Every person who becomes licensed to practice
law in this state shall enroll in the state bar by registering
his or her name and social security number with the association
within 10 days after admission to practice. Every change after
enrollment in any member's office address or social security
number shall be reported promptly to the state bar. The
social security number of a person enrolling in the state bar
may not be disclosed to any person except the department of workforce
development for the purpose of administering s. 49.22, stats.
SECTION 2. 11.04 (title) and 11.04 of the supreme court rules
be created to read:
11.04 (title) Suspension for nonpayment of
support, noncompliance with subpoena or warrant.
(1) In this rule:
(a) "Subpoena or warrant" means a subpoena or warrant
issued by the department of workforce development or a child
support agency and relating to paternity or support proceedings.
(b) "Support" means child or family support, maintenance,
birth expenses, medical expenses or other expenses related to
the support of a child or former spouse.
(2) Upon receipt of certification from the department of workforce
development pursuant to s. 49.857, stats., that a person licensed
to practice law in this state is delinquent in making court-ordered
payments of support or is not in compliance with a subpoena or
warrant, the supreme court shall suspend the license of that
person to practice law for 5 years in the case of delinquency
in making court-ordered payments of support or for 6 months in
the case of failure to comply with a subpoena or warrant.
(3) Before entering an order suspending an attorney's
license under sub. (2), the supreme court shall issue an order
requiring the attorney to show cause why his or her license to
practice law should not be suspended.
(4) A license to practice law suspended under sub. (2) shall
be reinstated as follows upon whichever of the following first
occurs:
(a) Automatically upon the expiration of the period for which
suspended.
(b) By order of the supreme court upon notification by the
department of workforce development that the attorney has paid
the delinquent support or has made satisfactory alternative payment
arrangements or has satisfied the requirements under the subpoena
or warrant.
(5) An attorney whose license to practice law is suspended
under sub (2) shall comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26.
SECTION 3. 40.06(4) of the supreme court rules be amended
to read:
(4) The board shall not certify an applicant while an attorney
disciplinary matter against the applicant is pending or the applicant
is certified by the department of workforce development as delinquent
in making court-ordered payments of support or failing to comply
with a subpoena or warrant, as those terms are defined in SCR
11.04(1). If an applicant's license to practice law in another
jurisdiction is suspended or revoked for reasons related to professional
responsibility at the time the application is filed or at any
time that the application is pending, the suspension or revocation
is a sufficient basis for denial of certification.
As an alternative to that procedure, the court is considering,
but is not proposing, the adoption of a requirement that at the
time of application for bar admission and annually on the State
Bar of Wisconsin dues statement, each applicant and attorney
licensed to practice law in Wisconsin, respectively, certify
that he or she is not delinquent in making court-ordered payments
of support or in noncompliance with a subpoena or warrant relating
to paternity or support proceedings. The failure of an applicant
or an attorney to make that certification or the making of a
certification that is false would constitute grounds for the
denial of bar admission or the suspension of the attorney's
license to practice law.
IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on this matter shall be
held in the Supreme Court Hearing Room, 119 Martin Luther King
Jr. Blvd., Madison, Wis., on Oct. 17, 2000, at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's conference in
the matter shall be held promptly following the public hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the hearing be given
by a single publication of a copy of this order in the official
state newspaper and in an official publication of the State Bar
of Wisconsin not more than 60 days or less than 30 days before
the date of the hearing.
Dated at Madison, Wis., this 26th day of April, 2000.
By the court:
Cornelia G. Clark, Clerk
Board
of Bar Examiners Fees
In the Matter of Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 40.14
- Board of Bar Examiners - Fees
Amended Order 00-08
On March 31, 2000, the Board of Bar Examiners submitted a
proposal for the increase of fees applicable to its responsibilities
in matters related to bar admission. The court has considered
the budget materials submitted by the board and has determined
that the requested increase in fees is necessary and appropriate
to maintain the board's operation in matters related to
bar admission. The court, on its own motion, adopts the following
amendment to Supreme Court Rule 40.14(3).
IT IS ORDERED that, effective Sept. 1, 2000, 40.14(3) of the
Supreme Court Rules is amended to read:
SCR 40.14 Application; fees.
(3) The following fees are payable to the board:
(a)Bar examination fee, $375 $450
(b)Late fee for bar examination, $100 $200
(c)Fee for application for admission on proof of practice
elsewhere, $725 $850
(d)Admission fee, $ 60 $100
(e)Fee for reinstatement, readmission, late admission on
diploma privilege or late enrollment in the bar, $200
(f)Application fee for change of name, $ 25
(g)Fee for a character and fitnessinvestigation under SCR
40.06(3m),$175 $210
(h)Late fee for a character and fitness investigation under
SCR 40.06(3m), $ 50 $100
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of this amendment of the
Supreme Court Rules be given by a single publication of a copy
of this order in the official state newspaper and in an official
publication of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
Dated at Madison, Wis., this 26th day of June, 2000.
By the court:
Cornelia G. Clark, Clerk
|
