Dispute Resolution Section Blog: A Positive Step Forward: Supreme Court Approves Drafting Role for Lawyer-mediators:

State Bar of Wisconsin

Sign In

Top Link Bar

    RACIAL EQUITY: It’s Time to Step Up. We Need Your Help. Click Here.​​

News & Pubs Search

-
Format: MM/DD/YYYY
  • Dispute Resolution Section Blog
    February
    10
    2017

    A Positive Step Forward: Supreme Court Approves Drafting Role for Lawyer-mediators

    Hon. Michael J. Dwyer, Susan A. Hansen

    Share This:
    On Jan. 12, 2017, the Wisconsin Supreme Court approved Rule Petition 16-04 that expanded the role of lawyer-mediators in family law cases. Hon. Michael Dwyer and Susan Hansen discuss the rule and what it means for the evolution of family law practice.

    On January 12, 2017, the Wisconsin Supreme Court approved Rule Petition 16-04, expanding the role of lawyer mediators in family law cases. The rule permits a lawyer-mediator who assists parties in reaching agreements in a case arising under the Family Code to draft, select, complete, modify, and file the legal documents required to implement agreements reached in mediation. The effective date will be set forth when the Court issues the formal order.

    Previously, lawyer mediators could not draft legal documents, such as Marital Settlement Agreements and Judgments, which meant that parties had to use checkbox forms, hire individual lawyers, or most frequently, do their legal drafting and filing themselves. The new rule authorizes neutral drafting, with informed written consent, and states the ethical rules of competence and diligence apply to such lawyer mediators.

    Minimum Requirements

    The rule specifies the minimum requirements for informed consent, which include:

    • an explanation of the lawyer’s limited role,
    • that the lawyer does not represent either party and cannot give legal advice to the parties, and
    • the desirability of each party seeking independent legal advice.

    The rule permits the lawyer-mediator to file the documents on behalf of the parties, but not appear in court. It requires the attorney to disclose that the document was drafted with the assistance of a lawyer acting as a mediator.

    An Efficient and Cost-effective Alternative

    The impetus for the rule was the need to adapt the practice of family law to address the dramatic increase in the number of parties who navigate the family court system without legal assistance. Given that an estimated 70 percent of all couples attempt to navigate their divorce without any legal assistance, mediation is an efficient and cost-effective alternative.

    Hon. Michael J. Dwyer gov michael.dwyer wicourts Michael J. Dwyer, Georgetown 1975, is presiding judge of the Family Division, Milwaukee Circuit Court. Before joining the bench in 1997, he was a general practitioner in Milwaukee County for more than 20 years.

    Susan A. Hansen com sah h-hlaw Susan A. Hansen, Marquette 1981, is the co-founder of Family Mediation Center and partner at Hansen & Hildebrand, S.C., Milwaukee. She has practiced for more than 30 years and specializes in family law, with an emphasis on collaborative divorce and mediation.

    The new rule allows parties to get the full value of a lawyer-mediator’s expertise by authorizing the lawyer to neutrally draft all legal documents needed on behalf of both parties. It is a significant advance in supporting the changing role of lawyers as neutral or limited scope problem-solvers, not just adversarial advocates.

    Reducing Conflict, Post-judgement Litigation

    Because mediation is not an adversarial two-lawyer process, parties who currently avoid lawyers for fear of escalating conflict or losing control of their case will be more willing to seek legal assistance from a lawyer-mediator to resolve their disputes. Having the lawyer-mediator draft all legal documents neutrally for both parties helps assure their joint decisions are well-informed and properly written for the court, and that all necessary implementation steps are taken. This will reduce conflict and post-judgment litigation that arises from ill-informed decisions or poorly drafted documents.

    The new rule is a trend-setting response to the evolution of family law. Wisconsin has taken a step that few other states have done. It is a positive step forward for the public, the legal profession, and the courts.





    Need help? Want to update your email address?
    Contact org service wisbar Customer Service, (800) 728-7788

    Dispute Resolution Section Blog is published by the State Bar of Wisconsin; blog posts are written by section members. To contribute to this blog, contact com llderr derrlaw Lisa Derr and review Author Submission Guidelines. Learn more about the Dispute Resolution Section or become a member.

    Disclaimer: Views presented in blog posts are those of the blog post authors, not necessarily those of the Section or the State Bar of Wisconsin. Due to the rapidly changing nature of law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, the State Bar of Wisconsin makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or completeness of this content.

    © 2020 State Bar of Wisconsin, P.O. Box 7158, Madison, WI 53707-7158.

    State Bar of Wisconsin Logo

Server Name