Maximum enlightenment requires maximum education. Blacks have
traditionally stressed education even at the risk of death during
American slavery. It's up to those of us who recognize what education
can do to demand that teachers teach, educators educate, students learn
and that school[s] serve as places for enlightenment rather than holding
tanks for ignorance, [or] fosterers [of] drop outs, cop outs and
scapegoats."1
* * *
Wisconsin's image of itself as a progressive state has not always
matched reality in the field of race relations. Black suffrage was
defeated several times at the polls before a favorable decision was
obtained in 1866 from the Wisconsin Supreme Court by early civil rights
pioneers Ezekiel Gillespie and Judge Byron Paine of Milwaukee.2 Several antidiscrimination statutes were enacted
in Wisconsin before World War II with the help of black lawyers such as
William T. Green and George De Reef, but the laws were seldom enforced
and de facto segregation was common.3
Since that time the struggle for equality has forced Wisconsinites to
confront segregation and discrimination repeatedly, a process that has
continued to this day.
Lloyd Barbee, a lawyer, a legislator, and an influential voice for
the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP),
led the modern civil rights movement in Wisconsin for many years.
Barbee's gentle manner concealed an iron determination that served him
and his cause well. Barbee occupies a unique place in Wisconsin legal
history and civil rights history. He was a skilled lawyer, an
influential state legislator, an active NAACP member and leader from a
young age to his death, and a courageous proponent of legislation
promoting race and gender equality and prison and court reform. Barbee
was a visionary: he regularly took up causes that would not be
confronted by society at large until years later, such as gay rights and
abortion. This article tells only a small part of his story. In this
year marking the 50th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Brown v. Board of Education,4 it is
fitting to recognize Wisconsin's most influential figure in implementing
that decision.
Early Years: Memphis to Milwaukee
(1925-1960)
Lloyd Barbee was born in Memphis, Tenn., on Aug. 17, 1925, the
youngest of three sons of Earnest and Adlena (Gilliam) Barbee. His
mother died when he was six months old.5 At
an early age Barbee embraced his father's and brothers' love of the
arts, listening to classical music and literature on the radio. From the
very beginning he showed signs of being someone special.6
Judge Maxine Aldridge
White, Marquette 1985, 2001 State Bar Judge of the Year, has
been a Milwaukee County circuit court judge for 12 years. Born the
eighth of 11 children to grade-school educated sharecroppers and raised
in the Deep South during the era of Jim Crow, she experienced racial
segregation and is a direct recipient of the opportunities resulting
from the sacrifices of Lloyd Barbee and others.
Joseph A. Ranney, Yale 1978, is a trial lawyer with
DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C., Madison. He is the author of Trusting
Nothing to Providence: A History of Wisconsin's Legal System (1999) and
has taught as an adjunct professor at Marquette University Law
School.
Barbee grew up in the Depression South, which was highly segregated
in every aspect of life. Although his family did not suffer the immense
poverty that marked the lives of many black Americans in the
1920s,7 Barbee's father taught him early on
about the hard times that he and other blacks experienced. Racial
prejudice was part of Barbee's everyday life in Memphis, but he was
fortunate to grow up in a family that challenged preconceived limits and
urged him to fight injustice.8 Barbee's
father was a painting contractor, the first African American member of
the [Tennesee] state contractor's union.9
His uncle also was a businessman, employing about 10 people building
houses and churches. The Barbee family also included many teachers, who
helped to ingrain in Barbee a love of learning and a thirst for
knowledge.10 His father was fascinated by
great orators and exposed Lloyd and his brothers to grand speakers and
the "art" of protest at an early age.11
Barbee attended segregated schools and joined the NAACP at the age of
12. At age 17 he experienced what he described as "outrage" when noted
activist A. Philip Randolph came to Memphis and black church leaders
were afraid to let Randolph speak in their churches about war and civil
rights. Lloyd was very upset that the church leaders "had no
backbone."12
After high school, Barbee served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946. While
remaining active in the NAACP, he attended LeMoyne College in Memphis,
earning a B.A. degree in 1949. Faced with threats to his safety and
disgusted with the atmosphere of the Jim Crow South, Barbee concluded
that there was no future for him in Memphis. He moved to Madison in 1949
to attend law school on a scholarship at the University of Wisconsin,
joining other early African American trailblazers at virtually all-white
universities.
Regrettably, life in Madison gave Barbee "new insights into the many
shades of discrimination" and brought home to him the fact that racial
prejudice was not confined to the South.13
He sadly realized that "conscious racial discrimination was common, and
unconscious racism among the educated was appallingly common."14 Angry about racial slights at the U.W. Law
School, Barbee dropped out after his first year but later returned and
earned his law degree in 1956.15 He
continued his affiliation with the NAACP, rising to become president of
the Madison chapter in 1955. In 1961 he was elected president of the
state branch of the NAACP.
After graduating, Barbee encountered difficulties in earning a living
as a black lawyer. He worked as an examiner for the state government and
served on both the state and Madison human rights commissions. In 1958
he initiated an in-depth report on racial discrimination in housing in
Madison, the first such report done on a Wisconsin city. In 1961 he
organized his first sit-in, a 13-day, round-the-clock vigil at the State
Capitol rotunda in support of fair housing and equal opportunity
legislation - the first demonstration of this type in the nation. In
1961 he succeeded in changing the name of Nigger Heel Lake in Polk and
Burnett counties, Wis., to Freedom Lake. Barbee also drafted the
proposal for the first comprehensive civil rights ordinance, which
subsequently passed in 1964 as the Madison Equal Opportunity
Ordinance.
The Fight to Desegregate Homes and Schools in
Milwaukee (1960-1976)
The turmoil generated in the South by the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954
decision in Brown and by Dr. Martin Luther King's civil rights
crusade16 did not reach Wisconsin and other
northern states until the early 1960s. In 1962 Assemblyman Isaac Coggs,
who was already fighting for stronger enforcement of Wisconsin fair
employment laws, encouraged Barbee to move to Milwaukee and run for an
Assembly seat. Barbee met with NAACP general counsel Robert Carter, who
was a leading attorney with Thurgood Marshall in the Brown
trial, to discuss strategies for dealing with school desegregation in
Northern cities. Carter and Roy Wilkins, head of the national NAACP, had
identified Barbee as "a skilled lawyer who understood the complex and
evolving case law on Northern school segregation" and as an "experienced
protest organizer."17 They encouraged
Barbee to move to Milwaukee and energize the local NAACP, and in late
1962 Barbee moved to the city that would remain his home for the rest of
his life.18
Commemorating the Struggle for Equality, Brown v. Board of
Education
America's circuitous march toward equality has changed our society
and our institutions and has profoundly reshaped the nation's attitudes
and values. The law has been instrumental in these changes, and has been
influenced by them in turn. Through law and the courts, one group of
Americans after another has redefined "equality" in a fiercely
contested, still ongoing process.
Significant in this process is the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 ruling
in Brown v. Board of Education. Brown struck down laws
segregating public schools, sounded the death knell for
government-sanctioned segregation generally, made all Americans more
aware of our Constitution's promise of equality, and helped launch the
civil rights movement.
To help celebrate the 50th anniversary of Brown, the State
Bar of Wisconsin hosts the following events:
State Bar Annual Convention, May 5-7, 2004
-
On May 6, NAACP Chair Julian Bond keynotes the spotlight program
"Civil Rights: Now and Then - Brown v. Board of Education: 50
Years Later." The Thursday morning program will be followed by a panel
discussion reflecting Brown's impact on Wisconsin law,
moderated by State Bar president-elect Michelle Behnke.
-
At Thursday's speaker showcase CLE luncheon, discussions of equality
continue with "Access to Justice: How Do We Make It Happen?" Speakers
and panelists will include Gov. James Doyle (invited), Chief Justice
Shirley Abrahamson, Rep. Mark Gundrum, and Attorney General Peggy
Lautenschlager.
-
"... with all deliberate speed..." (From Brown v. Board of
Education), a Thursday afternoon panel presentation by the
Diversity Outreach Committee and Government Lawyers Division, concludes
the Bar's formal look at Brown and issues of equality and
access to justice and education.
Law-related Education and Public Outreach
Programs
-
The Diversity Outreach Committee worked with a social studies
teacher to develop a lesson plan from ABA materials on Brown to
assist lawyers with school presentations. In late winter, lawyers
visited schools in Dane, Milwaukee, and Waukesha counties to share
information on the history of civil rights, issues in education, and law
as a career.
-
The Law-related Education Committee worked with the state Department
of Public Instruction to develop materials and lesson plans to assist
lawyers and judges in making presentations on Brown.
-
The Bar helped to underwrite the costs of a Law Day luncheon
celebration cosponsored by the Office of the Chief Justice and the
Wisconsin Legal History Committee. Held at the state Capitol on Monday,
April 26, the event brought together students and educators to hear from
people who attended segregated schools. The program emphasized the
pre-Brown struggles and the importance of the law and education
in the lives of Wisconsin's young people.
-
Marquette University Law School (with the State Bar as cosponsor)
created two conferences. On April 8, the program "Segregation and
Resegregation: Wisconsin's Unfinished Experience" explored the road to Brown. An October program (TBA) will look at present and future
issues in education.
Local operation and control of schools had long been a cornerstone of
Wisconsin's education system, and the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) had
operated a neighborhood-based school system for many years.19 In response to the Brown decision, MPS
in 1958 began a program known as "intact busing," under which large
numbers of black students and teachers were bussed to white schools but
remained in segregated classrooms.20 Up to
1962, both Milwaukee housing and schools had proven resistant to
integration. As a result, most blacks lived in the city's "Inner Core"
area, which was plagued by substandard living conditions.21 At that time, blacks made up approximately 6
percent of Milwaukee's population. By 1965 blacks represented 10.2
percent of the city's population. A 1960 report concluded that Milwaukee
had the most pronounced pattern of racial separation in the
nation.22 Barbee saw a chance to attack
segregation in Milwaukee by using the strategy, first employed in the
case of Taylor v. City of New Rochelle (1961), of
showing that although residential segregation contributed to school
segregation, "the [school] board's own actions (and inactions) had
reinforced and intensified the racial segregation."23
Barbee quickly impressed his new neighbors in Milwaukee: in 1962 he
was chosen to head the Milwaukee branch of the NAACP and in 1964 he was
elected to the Assembly, where he served for six terms.24 Barbee's constituents wanted quick action to
combat segregation, and they got it. A few weeks after his election to
the Legislature, Barbee demanded that MPS desegregate its schools and
presented a desegregation plan that called for selective busing to
achieve a more even racial balance in the schools. Barbee's demand
triggered a sharp internal struggle within MPS. The conservative faction
prevailed: MPS informed Barbee that neighborhood schools had to be
preserved at all costs and that selective busing was not
acceptable.25 Barbee responded by warning a
meeting of Milwaukee lawyers that racial injustice was not confined to
the atrocities then taking place in the South but also existed at home.
"If the Brown decision means anything," said Barbee, "it means
that school segregation is unconstitutional wherever it exists, north or
south."26
During the mid-1960s Barbee repeatedly reminded Milwaukeeans that
their schools violated the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in
Brown that segregation was inherently unequal. As evidence,
Barbee relied upon the increasing numbers of mostly black schools and
MPS's practice of placing black teachers only in black schools. He
called upon school administrators "to act affirmatively" to eliminate
segregation or risk a legal battle in the courts and mass protests in
the streets. Both local white authorities and the established black
leadership responded defensively to Barbee's charge of segregation. They
argued that segregation in Milwaukee was due to geographic patterns over
which they had no control, and they suggested that Barbee "attack job
discrimination and housing discrimination" instead.27
Barbee formed a desegregation coalition of community leaders who
supported his cause, and in January 1964 he led the coalition in its
first confrontation with MPS. The meeting began with school board chair
and attorney Harry Story directing Barbee to be seated apart from the
other members of his coalition. Barbee resisted this attempt to split up
the coalition and walked out of the meeting. This action cemented
Barbee's reputation as someone who would not compromise his values and
made him a hero to some factions, because he passed up a clear chance to
enhance his own personal importance in favor of maintaining unity and
preserving the coalition.
Later that year, when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. visited Milwaukee,
he complimented Barbee by stating: "Several months ago, the Northern
Negro arose from his apathetic slumber." Dr. King encouraged
Milwaukeeans to follow Barbee's lead, stating that: "A school boycott is
a creative way to dramatize the whole issue."28
After a series of marches and demonstrations failed to move MPS,
Barbee and the NAACP formed the Milwaukee United School Integration
Committee (MUSIC) in 1965. MUSIC organized a boycott of public schools
and created "Freedom Schools" to take their place. MPS responded by
creating an "open transfer" policy, which made it easier for black
students to transfer to schools outside the inner city but did not
require white students to leave their neighborhoods. The new policy
backfired: many white students left the few remaining integrated
Milwaukee schools, and black students who went outside the inner city
for their education often ended up in segregated classes.29
Barbee soon concluded that black Milwaukeeans had a better chance of
achieving integration through the courts than through lobbying MPS. In
July 1965 he filed a suit in federal court, Amos v. Board of School
Directors of the City of Milwaukee. Barbee argued that even though
MPS had not maintained an official policy of segregation, the pattern of
segregation that had developed in Milwaukee since the 1940s violated the
right of black students to equal protection under the law. The
Amos case turned into a battle of epic proportions, consuming
eight years of discovery and preparation before it went to trial.
Barbee faced opposition not only from MPS officials but also from
people who agreed with his aims but disagreed with his timing and
tactics. Even the national NAACP came to believe that the public school
desegregation battle could not be won at that time in Milwaukee. It felt
that prospects for success were greater in Cleveland and devoted its
resources to that city. Barbee was largely left to fight on his own
without significant help until Judge John Reynolds appointed counsel to
assist him as the trial approached. Ironically, the NAACP lost the
Cleveland case, while Barbee eventually emerged victorious in
Milwaukee.30
Barbee faced not only occupational risk but also the risk of physical
danger as a result of his stand for justice. Violence against civil
rights activists was all too common in the 1960s. On March 7, 1965, only
four months before Barbee filed the Amos case, approximately
600 civil rights marchers in Alabama were attacked with clubs and tear
gas by state and local law enforcement officers, an incident that became
known as Bloody Sunday. Less than a year before Barbee filed the
Amos case, the bodies of slain civil rights activists James
Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner were found in Mississippi.
In 1963 President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and Medgar Evers,
NAACP leader in Jackson, Miss., was murdered. On Feb. 21, 1965, Malcolm
X, a man Barbee respected quite a bit, was murdered.31 In 1967, the urban riots that plagued other
major American cities in the mid-1960s came to Milwaukee. In 1968,
Robert F. Kennedy was killed in Los Angeles and Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. was assassinated in Memphis, Tenn., Barbee's hometown.
Barbee received a full measure of threats and hate mail directed at
him and at his children - but he was determined to persevere, and he
soldiered on in spite of the danger. His daughter Daphne recalls that
the threats were frightening, but she also remembers her father saying,
"these threats are not going to stop me." Barbee believed that despite
the danger "if people want justice, they are going to have to keep on
fighting for justice."32
Trial of the Amos case finally began in late 1973 before
Judge Reynolds. MPS argued that Reynolds should make no changes in the
school system because MPS did not deliberately segregate students and
because integration would not improve the schooling black children
received. MPS also warned, prophetically, that desegregation could
trigger massive flight of white students to suburban school districts.
Barbee consistently argued that Reynolds's duty was to make a legal
decision, not a practical political decision, and that MPS could not get
around the central fact of the case: segregation violated black
students' right to equal protection of the law.
In 1976 Reynolds issued his decision.33
He agreed that MPS had not intentionally segregated Milwaukee schools
but he concluded that MPS had acted "with the full knowledge that racial
segregation existed ... and would continue to exist unless certain
policies were changed."34 Reynolds also
agreed with Barbee that the risk of white flight was not something he
should consider in making his decision. Reynolds explained that:
"The Constitution does not guarantee one a quality education; it
guarantees one an equal education, and the law in this country is that a
segregated education that is mandated by school authorities is
inherently unequal. ... If the law against intentional school
segregation is unworkable, then it should be repealed. Until then, it
must be obeyed."35
The months following the Amos decision were the pinnacle of
Barbee's civil rights career. Having attained a successful ruling,
Barbee was concerned that the legal victory would not be translated into
concrete change and improvement in the educational system. "The whole
system should be ordered to desegregate, root and branch," Barbee urged.
"If we don't do that, then we will have engaged in a paper
victory."36
Barbee worked with a chastened MPS to formulate a remedial plan. This
seems particularly indicative of Barbee's motivations, not merely to win
the case, but to help in crafting a solution. The plan finally approved
by Reynolds called for limited busing to achieve greater racial balance
in Milwaukee schools, funds for specialty schools to induce white
suburban students to transfer to MPS, and funds to help black students
adjust to suburban schools. Although the U.S. Supreme Court had recently
ruled in Milliken v. Bradley (1974) that suburban districts
could not be forced to participate in desegregation of urban
districts,37 Barbee and MPS persuaded many
Milwaukee suburban districts to join the plan. In mid-1976 Barbee had
the satisfaction of seeing his colleagues in the Legislature agree to
fund the plan.38 Barbee suffered a
temporary setback when the case was appealed and remanded for Reynolds
to reconsider his decision in light of recent school segregation
cases,39 but after doing so Reynolds
reaffirmed his order in 1978.40
Final Years: Steps Forward and Steps Backward
(1976-2002)
Barbee's triumph was not unalloyed. In the years after Amos,
white flight, the school choice program, and divisions in the black
community dealt setbacks to his vision of a fully integrated
society.41 In his later years, Barbee
acknowledged that the Milwaukee school system today is just as
segregated as it was in 1965. However, he argued that there is a
positive value in the fact that the segregation today does not have the
overt sanction of government that it had before Brown. Like the
Brown court, Barbee understood that government-sponsored
segregation inflicts its own kind of damage, stigmatizing certain
citizens merely on the basis of color and damaging their sense of self
worth and thereby denying the nation those citizens' full talents.
Barbee understood the self-destructive folly of such practices and
devoted his life to removing them from our educational system. Barbee
was the full embodiment and inheritor of the challenge laid down by the
NAACP's Charles Hamilton Houston, one of the principal architects of the
Brown victory:
"There come times when it is possible to forecast the results of a
contest, of a battle, of a lawsuit long before the final event has taken
place; and so far as our struggle for civil rights is concerned, the
struggle for civil rights in America is won. What I am more concerned
about is the fact that the Negro shall not be content simply with
demanding an equal share in the existing system. It seems to me that his
historical challenge is to make sure that the system which shall survive
in the United States of America shall be a system which guarantees
justice and freedom for everyone."42
In the Legislature and in the community, Barbee was often the only
voice for people or causes who had no other voice. In many circles he
was referred to as "the outrageous Mr. Barbee," a role used to challenge
the complacency of both blacks and whites. Like Houston, Lloyd Barbee
was a workhorse who dedicated his life to helping others, for little or
no pay, often so engrossed in his work that he forgot to eat.43 Barbee is truly an example of how much one
lawyer can accomplish when motivated by a passion to open the gates of
justice to the entire human race. As his son stated:
"The most important thing I learned from my dad was that we are all
only human beings - we are not black or white, ... this is our race and
our condition and if we only accept this, then we can move on to deal
with the human problems that we all face. ... This is who my dad was and
the legacy that we, all humans, must continue to struggle with."44
Barbee died at age 77 on Dec. 29, 2002, but his legacy has not been
lost:
"I am not discouraged. I have seen more difficult times. We are not
as well off as we could be, but we are better off than we were."45
Endnotes
1Lloyd Barbee Papers, Wisconsin
Black Historical Society and Museum.
2Gillespie v. Palmer, 20
Wis. 544 (1866); Joseph A. Ranney, Trusting Nothing to Providence: A
History of Wisconsin's Legal System 536-40 (1999); Leslie H.
Fishel, Wisconsin and Negro Suffrage, 46 Wis. Mag. Hist. 180
(Spring 1963).
3See Joe William Trotter
Jr., Black Milwaukee: The Making of an Industrial Proletariat,
1915-1945, at 103-08 (1985).
4Brown v. Board of
Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
5Quinten Barbee, A Family
Remembers, Wis. Senior Advoc., Special Tribute Edition to Lloyd A.
Barbee, Sept. - Oct. 2003, at 6.
6Dr. Sean P. Keane, Struggle
for Liberation in Northern Ireland, Wis. Senior Advoc.,
supra note 5, at 20.
7Lloyd Barbee: I
Remember Milwaukee, 108 (WMVS/WMVT television broadcast, April 19,
1995).
8Interview with Daphne
Barbee-Wooten and Rustam Barbee, Feb. 5, 2004, at 18 (transcript on file
with Judge Maxine White).
9Id. at 40.
10Id. at 17.
11Lloyd Barbee: I
Remember Milwaukee, supra note 7, at 108.
12Id.
13The Legacy of Lloyd
Barbee, Wis. Senior Advoc., supra note 5, at 4.
14Id. at 15 (remarks of
J. Quinn Brisben).
15Barbee, Lloyd A., 1925-2002.
Papers, 1993-1982. U.W.-Milwaukee.
16See generally Taylor
Branch, Parting the Waters: America in the King Years,
1954-1963 (1988).
17Jack Dougherty, More Than
One Struggle: The Evolution of Black School Reform in Milwaukee 76
(2004).
18Id. at 76, 80.
19Lloyd P. Jorgenson, The
Founding of Public Education in Wisconsin 15-22, 36-37 (1956);
Conrad E. Patzer, Public Education in Wisconsin 5-10, 348-63
(1924).
20Leonard Sykes Jr., Legacy of Brown Case a Mix of Hope, Frustration, Milw. J. Sentinel, Jan.
31, 2004.
21Frank A. Aukofer, City With
a Chance 35-39 (1968).
22Suburban Negro Ratio Lowest
in the Country, Milw. J., April 26, 1965.
23Dougherty, supra note
17, at 75; Taylor v. City of New Rochelle, 191 F. Supp. 181
(S.D.N.Y. 1961).
24See Wisconsin Blue
Book, 1965-66.
25Aukofer, supra note
21, at 50-55.
26Dougherty, supra note
17, at 71.
27Id. at 72-73.
28Dougherty, supra note
17, citing Milwaukee Star, Feb. 1, 1964.
29Ranney, supra note 2,
at 553-61; see also Amos v. Board of Sch. Dir. City of
Milwaukee, 408 F. Supp. 765, 792-93 (E.D. Wis. 1976).
30Interview with Daphne
Barbee-Wooten and Rustam Barbee, supra note 8, at 21.
31Id. at 9.
32Id. at 38.
33See supra note 29.
34Amos, 408 F. Supp. at
819.
35Id. at 821.
36The Legacy of Lloyd
Barbee, Wis. Senior Advoc., supra note 5, at 5.
37418 U.S. 717, 741-42
(1974).
38Laws of 1976, ch. 220.
39Armstrong v. Brennan,
539 F.2d 625 (7th Cir. 1976), rev'd, 433 U.S. 672 (1977),
on remand, 566 F.2d 1175 (7th Cir. 1977).
40Armstrong v.
O'Connell, 451 F. Supp. 817, 825, 866 (E.D. Wis. 1978).
41See Ranney,
supra note 2, at 553-61.
42The Road to Brown
(University of Virginia 1995).
43Interviews with Elizabeth Coggs
Jones, Lucinda Gordon, and Ann Tevik (transcripts on file with Judge
Maxine White); Wis. Senior Advoc., supra note 5, at 8, 9.
44Interview with Finn Barbee
(transcript on file with Judge Maxine White).
45Barbee, I Remember
Milwaukee, supra note 7, at 108.