Vol. 70, No. 11, November
1997
Equal Justice Coalition:
Finding Innovative Solutions to Funding the
Legal Needs of the Poor
By Diane Molvig
Legal service agencies always have been vulnerable to shifts in the political
winds. In fiscal 1995 the U.S. House Appropriations Committee set the national
Legal Services Corporation's (LSC) funding at $400 million. That amount
was cut significantly in recent years. The ill winds have continued to blow
and in January 1996 legal service agencies were hit with an Arctic blast,
when the 104th Congress voted to reduce LSC funding by 30
Many of Wisconsin's poor depend
upon federal funding for access to the legal system. However, lost in political
debate is the impact funding cuts have on real people. The Equal Justice
Coalition sets out to build a funding base that ensures access to legal
services that is not vulnerable to shifts in political winds.. |
percent. Since then, the U.S. House of Representatives approved funding
the LSC at $250 million. The amount is up significantly from the $141 million
proposed by the Judiciary Committee but down slightly from the current $283
million operating level.
A majority of the Wisconsin delegation supported the amendment, including
U.S. Representatives Thomas Barrett, Jay Johnson, Ron Kind, Gerald Kleczka,
Scott Klug and David Obey.
Because the Senate version of the appropriations bill sets LSC funding
at $300 million, a conference committee will decide the final amount of
funding.
In Wisconsin the four agencies dependent upon LSC dollars saw their funding
drop by 28 percent in fiscal 1996, from roughly $5.5 million to slightly
less than $4 million. It may get worse. As was clear in the recent round
of budget debates about LSC's future, key congressional members support
eventual elimination of all federal government support for LSC.
But while legal service funding dwindles, the legal problems of our nation's
poor people persist, even increase. Filling the gap between support and
need will require innovative solutions. Working toward that end is a new
group in Wisconsin, known as the Equal Justice Coalition, a nonprofit organization
made up of representatives from the State Bar, the state's five largest
legal service agencies and the Wisconsin Trust Account Foundation (WisTAF).
The coalition is an outgrowth of the State Bar Delivery of Legal Services
Commission, appointed in 1995 by then Bar president John Skilton. The commission
recommended in its mid-1996 report: The State Bar should provide leadership
in exploring alternative funding sources for legal service agencies.
"Our commission came up with a recommendation, which has become
the Equal Justice Coalition," explains Milwaukee attorney Maureen McGinnity,
the commission's reporter and now coalition member. "As I view it,
the coalition is the action arm through which Wisconsin will address the
crisis in legal services to poor people."
The coalition's first effort is under way: a statewide fund-raising campaign
to replace the funds that Congress cut from legal assistance programs.
More need, less money
Why did Congress deal LSC such a major blow? At least part of the reason
stems from the perception that legal service agencies consist of "a
lot of '60s radicals who are trying to turn the world into a people's paradise,"
observes Green Bay attorney Herbert Liebmann, vice president of the Equal
Justice Coalition's board of directors. "But that's not really what
95 percent of the legal service operations are about. The current Congress
called for reform, saying, 'We don't want our tax dollars used to recreate
the Great Society.' But then they tossed the baby out with the bath water."
The reality of those words strikes home with the lawyers who staff legal
assistance programs. Lost in the political debate was the impact LSC cuts
would have on real people in communities everywhere. The Legal Services
Corporation estimates that 708,000 Wisconsin residents in 1997 will live
at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, thus making them
eligible for assistance from a legal services agency. The LSC also estimates
that 30 percent of those residents or 212,400 have some civil legal services
need. However, with current funding, the agencies last year could only serve
13 percent or 22,000 low income people with legal needs. Agencies have little
choice but to turn away many of the thousands of clients who come to them
for help in escaping domestic violence, securing medical benefits to cope
with a disability or fighting an unlawful eviction from their home.
"Those are the kinds of cases we do day in, day out," says
Daniel Tuchscherer, director of Legal Services of Northeastern Wisconsin,
one of the four legal service agencies in the state dependent upon LSC funds.
(The others are Legal Action of Wisconsin, Western Wisconsin Legal Services
and Wisconsin Judicare. A fifth agency, the Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee,
does not receive LSC dollars but has been hurt by funding cuts as private
foundations face increasing demands for their donation dollars.)
"If you look at our client population and listen to their problems,"
Tuchscherer adds, "you realize that there, but for the grace of God,
go I. How many people do you know who are only two or three paychecks away
from not being able to pay their bills or afford their rent or mortgage?
Our clients don't choose to not work and to be poor. It is not a fun life.
It is not a vacation. It's a struggle every day."
What Do Legal Service
Agencies Do?
In 1995 Wisconsin legal service agencies assisted
22,000 people, including:
6,320
families that needed legal help to break the cycle of family violence and
secure child custody and support;
4,455
families that sought legal assistance to correct severely substandard housing
conditions, prevent unlawful evictions and prepare for home ownership; and
5,209
elderly and disabled people and low-income parents in need of advocates
to improve their access to health care, child care, job training, food stamps
and other benefits that helped them care for their families. |
The target clientele for legal assistance programs includes people living
on incomes below 125 percent of the federal poverty level. For instance,
for a family of four the poverty-level annual gross income is $15,600; 125
percent of that is $19,400. In Wisconsin, 708,000 citizens fall into the
qualifying group.
For Tuchscherer the funding cuts meant losing nearly $200,000 of his
former $750,000 annual budget. The number of people his agency is able to
serve in a year has dropped from 3,500 to 2,700, a 23 percent decrease.
He's had to close the agency's Sheboygan office, leaving the Green Bay and
Oshkosh offices to cover a 7,000-square-mile area encompassing 15 counties.
Staff attorneys dropped from nine to seven. "It's meant more time on
the road for our attorneys," Tuchscherer says. "They're spread
thinner, which means we're able to provide less service."
But the availability of legal services affects more than the individuals
in need, Tuchscherer contends. "If I can represent somebody at the
homeless shelter in Green Bay," he says, "and succeed in establishing
he has a disability and is entitled to SSI benefits, then he'll have $550
a month coming in. The community won't have to support him in the homeless
shelter. If I help him get food stamps, he won't have to rely on the local
food pantry. If he has a medical assistance card, he'll have access to medical
care and won't have to rely on the hospital emergency room for primary treatment.
So not only does this make a world of difference for the individual client
but the entire community benefits."
Lawyers are likely to see repercussions of the funding cuts in yet other
ways, Liebmann points out. As services diminish, there will be "an
awful lot of people floundering around in the legal system without decent
guidance," he says. That situation will generate more work, more delays
and more costs for the justice system.
Add another question: Who else will fill in as legal service agencies
wane or face extinction? Private attorneys do provide pro bono services,
but they can't begin to assume the entire caseload.
"It's an absolute verity," Liebmann says, "that legal
service offices can do this work more efficiently than (private attorneys)
can do it on a part-time basis, case by case."
The Wisconsin campaign
To avert a disaster in the making, the Equal Justice Coalition has launched
a statewide fund-raising drive. The initial goal is to raise $5 million
over three years to meet the immediate shortfall of legal services funding.
This first step amounts to "a Band-Aid fix," says Skilton, president
of the coalition's board of directors. "Even though the dollars are
staggering, it's still only a holding pattern."
Looking at the longer term, the coalition hopes to build a funding
base, drawn from multiple private and public sources, that will ensure the
future financial stability of legal service programs.
Coalition members are aiming the first phase of the fund-raising campaign
at their legal colleagues. The campaign then will reach out to corporations
and private foundations with the aid of the coalition's Leadership Council,
a diverse group of legal and corporate leaders. Why start with attorneys?
Reasons range from the philosophical to the practical.
"Seeing to it that people have proper representation, who may not
have the means otherwise, is a special responsibility of the legal profession,"
says former Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Heffernan, coalition board
member and cochair of the Leadership Council. "Just look at the motto
that appears on the U.S. Supreme Court building: 'Equal justice under law.'
Lawyers know that people lacking representation, who don't know what their
legal rights are, can't have equal justice."
"In practical terms," adds Liebmann, "our fund-raising
advisors tell us, and they're certainly right, that when we try to solicit
contributions from others, the first thing they're going to ask is 'What
are the lawyers doing?' So it's important that the bar respond in a uniform
way, and in a big way, if we're going to be successful in involving other
components of society."
Of the $5 million goal, the coalition aims to raise half from Wisconsin
attorneys. The fund-raising drive will shift into high gear this fall, with
hopes of procuring $1 million in lawyers' pledged contributions by the end
of December.
"What we're really trying to say here," notes McGinnity, the
coalition's Leadership Council cochair, "is that we as lawyers appear
to be in the best position not to totally fund alternate support, but to
invent ways to generate it. That's what we're trying to do: invent a solution
and encourage lawyers to come on board to help."
A cooperative venture
A unique feature of the Equal Justice Coalition campaign is that it marks
the first time the five largest Wisconsin legal services programs have pooled
their efforts to garner donations. "We have a history of working together
around substantive legal issues through task forces and shared training
events," Tuchscherer points out, "but fund-raising is not something
we've done collectively."
By running one joint campaign, the coalition believes it can capitalize
on economies of scale. It costs less to administer one campaign than five
campaigns. Tuchscherer sees another key benefit of the cooperative effort.
"I could conduct a fund drive in my service area," he says,
"and I could get support from lawyers in my area. But I couldn't attract
Nate Heffernan to head up the campaign steering committee, and I couldn't
attract John Skilton to be president of the board. So getting everybody
to work together draws support from people around the state."
Bar members can add their support by, first, writing a check to the Equal
Justice Coalition, P.O. Box 363, Brookfield, WI 53008-0363. The coalition
is calling for donations of substantial amounts. The Wisconsin Trust Account
Foundation will receive the raised funds to make grants to agencies that
provide direct legal services to low income families and individuals statewide.
Since its inception in 1986, WisTAF has granted more than $12 million to
legal service agencies.
"If we're talking about pledges of $1,000 over three years,"
Liebmann notes, "that may sound like a lot of money. But that's less
than $1 a day. I think most practicing professionals can find a way to squeeze
out a buck a day."
Attorneys also can aid the coalition's cause by spreading its message
in their communities. "We need lawyers to be ambassadors with their
local politicians and other decision-makers," McGinnity says, "to
let people know how critical it is to maintain legal services funding. We
need to build a broad-based understanding of the necessity of these services."
Dianne Molvig operates Access Information Service,
a Madison research, writing and editing service. She is a frequent contributor
to area publications. |