Preparing for the
Future
Improving
the Present
Board News
he State Bar Board of Governors,
with input from individual members, committees, sections, and
divisions, continued to address various issues affecting the
future of the practice of law.
Opposition to mandatory court forms. The board unanimously
passed a resolution opposing a petition from the Wisconsin Supreme
Court's Records Management Committee requiring mandatory use
of standard court forms in civil and criminal actions in the
circuit court, or in any other court as directed by the Wisconsin
Supreme Court or Legislature.
The Board of Governors manages and directs
the Bar's affairs and activities. The board consists of
the five officers and immediate past-president, 34 members elected
from the Bar districts, one member each from the Young Lawyers
and Government Lawyers divisions, three Nonresident Lawyers Division
members, and three nonlawyers. |
Board member William Mulligan spoke on behalf of the State
Bar at the supreme court's public hearing on the matter: "The
practice of law is more than making check marks and filling blanks
in forms. This proposed rule would deprofessionalize the practice
of law and encourage the legally untrained to prepare and file
documents with the courts without an understanding of the legal
consequences."
The court ultimately ordered the use of mandatory forms, beginning
Jan. 1, 2000 in criminal court and July 1, 2000 in civil court.
SCR amendment on lawyer advertising. The Board of Attorneys
Professional Responsibility (BAPR) proposed an amendment to the
Supreme Court Rules regarding targeted, direct mail advertising
sent from attorneys to prospective clients. The change would
have required direct mail to have the words "advertising
material" stamped on the envelope in red ink and that any
recorded communication, such as video or audio tape have those
words at the beginning and end. The Board of Governors voted
to request that BAPR not file the petition with the court until
the board could solicit member input and discuss the issue in
greater detail.
Juror secrecy. The supreme court's Records Management
Committee brought a petition before the Wisconsin Supreme Court
recommending changes to the way jurors are identified in court.
To protect juror privacy, the committee recommended identifying
jurors by number. Jurors would not be asked for any personal
information such as name, address, and place of employment during
voir dire or juror questioning. The Board of Governors unanimously
opposed the petition, which the supreme court ultimately rejected,
stating that the proposed system would severely limit attorneys'
ability to pick impartial juries.
Approval of lobbying for legal services funding. The
board unanimously voted to support a legislative position endorsing
state general purpose revenue to provide civil legal assistance
by lawyers to low-income residents. This action allowed the State
Bar Government Relations Team to work with the Equal Justice
Coalition to lobby at the state Legislature for federal funds
allocated at the state level. The Wisconsin Trust Account Foundation
and the State Bar's pro bono program worked closely with the
effort. The 1999-2001 Biennial Budget Bill included $100,000
per year for civil legal services for low-income residents.
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility. The
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (BAPR) was a topic
of much discussion in FY 99. At the end of the fiscal year, the
State Bar's BAPR Study Committee made recommendations for improving
the current system. The recommendations were unanimously approved
by the board and sent to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for consideration.
The supreme court asked a team from the ABA to perform an outside
evaluation of the current disciplinary system. The Bar has the
opportunity to work with BAPR, the public, and the supreme court
to improve the current system of lawyer discipline in the coming
year.
Long-range planning
The State Bar continues to take the pulse of its professional
and financial health with its strategic planning and long-range
financial planning efforts. What began in FY 98 as multi-year
budgeting evolved into a long-range financial planning process
during FY 99. This process calls on staff and leadership to focus
on a 36-month calendar while considering the Bar's financial
future. The goal of the process is to identify a clear direction
for the association over a three-year period and to maintain
greater consistency in an ever-changing association environment.
After considerable debate, the Board of Governors approved
a long-range financial plan to take the Bar through the year
2002. Included in the plan was a $35 dues increase, effective
July 1, 1999. FY 00 has been identified as the target year for
merging the long-range financial plan with the State Bar's strategic
planning activities, which began under Project Vision in FY 98.
A Look Ahead
As one fiscal year ends and FY 00 begins, the State Bar is
faced with several new challenges. Following is a handful of
issues that the Bar will work on under the leadership of President
Leonard Loeb and President-elect Gary Bakke.
- The Board of Governors will be charged with hiring a new
executive director to oversee Bar staff and the affairs of
the association. A search committee will conduct a nationwide
search, with the goal of filling this position by January 2000.
- A new Multidisciplinary Practice Commission was formed
to study the issues surrounding partnerships of lawyers and practitioners
of other disciplines who work together to solve client problems.
Rules of professional conduct currently prohibit lawyers from
sharing fees with nonlawyers. The commission will study the issue
and develop a recommendation for the board by the end of FY 00.
- State Bar CLE is working to develop a plan for hands-on
computer training courses for members. This initiative grew
from the State Bar's 1998 Technology Survey in which 56 percent
of the respondents said that hands-on training in computer and
software skills would help them in their practice. The primary
hands-on training need identified by respondents was learning
how to conduct legal research on the Internet.
- A statewide public service campaign is underway to
educate people about the need for advanced medical directives.
With the help of the local and specialty bars and community agencies,
a Life Planning Initiative in May 2000 will promote the
idea of advanced care planning.
|