On Nov. 21 the FDIC clarified the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program to include Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts. Consistent with its mission to ensure stability in the banking community, the FDIC has acted to protect client funds and assure continued funding for programs that provide legal aid to poor people when economic uncertainties make the need for legal guidance most critical. As a result of this action, an individual client’s funds deposited in IOLTA are fully insured regardless of the amount.
Wisconsin
Lawyer
Vol. 81, No. 12, December
2008
FDIC includes IOLTA in unlimited deposit insurance
under temporary liquidity guarantee program
On Nov. 21 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) clarified
the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program to include Interest on Lawyer
Trust Accounts (IOLTA). Consistent with its mission to ensure stability
in the banking community, the FDIC has acted to protect client funds and
assure continued funding for programs that provide legal aid to poor
people when economic uncertainties make the need for legal guidance most
critical. As a result of this action, an individual client’s funds
deposited in IOLTA are fully insured regardless of the amount.
"The WisTAF board has been watching this issue very carefully and has
been attempting to disseminate accurate information to attorneys
considering FDIC coverage of IOLTA trust accounts," says WisTAF board
member John E. Bermingham, Oshkosh. "This ruling clarifies the
protection available to individual clients within an attorney or law
firm's IOLTA Trust account. I am pleased that our clients' funds are
fully protected."
The ABA, working with state and local bar associations and individual
lawyers nationwide, made a persuasive case to the FDIC why IOLTA funds
must be included in the expanded insurance program. Had the FDIC failed
to expand full coverage for IOLTA, lawyers would have had to consider
abandoning IOLTA for fully insured non interest bearing accounts or
moving IOLTA funds from community banks to the larger “too big to
fail” banks. Abandoning IOLTA would have been catastrophic for
IOLTA programs in all 50 states, which provide funding for legal aid for
the poor. Moving the accounts to larger banks would have defeated the
FDIC’s purpose in creating the TLGP.
FDIC Press
Release and final rule
ABA
Statement
Wisconsin
Lawyer