State Bar of Wisconsin Return to Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission Awards

Download this document in Adobe PDF

James R. Meier Mailing Address:

Chairperson 14 West Mifflin Street

A. Henry Hempe P. O. Box 7870

Commissioner Madison, WI 53707-7870

Paul A. Hahn Telephone: (608) 266-1381

Commissioner Fax: (608) 266-6930

State of Wisconsin

Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission

June 24, 1997

Mr. David Campshure

Staff Representative

Wisconsin Council 40,


1566 Lynwood Lane

Green Bay, WI 54311

Mr. Richard Boren

City Attorney

City of Marinette

1905 Hall Avenue

P. O. Box 135

Marinette, WI 54143

Re: City of Marinette (Wastewater)

AFSCME Local 260

(Grievance of Richard Dubord)

Case 78 No. 55006 MA-9865


This letter is to confirm the "bench" decision rendered by the undersigned in the above-entitled matter on June 11, 1997, in Marinette, Wisconsin.

On April 11, 1997, the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission designated Dennis P. McGilligan as the impartial arbitrator to resolve the above dispute.

Hearing in the matter was held on June 11, 1997, as noted above. At the hearing the parties requested, and the undersigned agreed to provide, a "bench" award, which is herein confirmed. The parties agreed to waive "any explanation" for the Arbitrator's "bench" decision.

The parties stipulated that there were no procedural issues, and that the instant dispute was properly before the Arbitrator for a decision on its merits pursuant to the terms of the parties' collective bargaining agreement.

The parties also stipulated as to the removal of the paragraph relating to the Grievant leaving work because he was ill from the City's written reprimand dated October 29, 1996. The City stated, and the Union agreed, that said paragraph was no longer a "reason" for imposing the written reprimand.

The parties were unable to agree on the issue before the Arbitrator. Therefore, based on the entire record, the Arbitrator framed the issue as follows:

Was there just cause to discipline the Grievant for the activities cited in the City's letter dated October 29, 1996?

The Arbitrator found that the answer to the above question was YES, the City did have just cause to discipline the Grievant for the activities cited in its letter dated October 29, 1996. However, based on the entire record and the language of Article 17, the Arbitrator reduced the written warning to a verbal reprimand.

The parties agreed that a copy of this letter would be put in the Grievant's personnel file in place of the written warning letter dated October 29, 1996.

By terms of this letter I am confirming same and closing the file on the above case.

Very truly yours,

Dennis P. McGilligan /s/

Dennis P. McGilligan