Return to wisbar.org
Wisconsin Supreme Court
2002 WI 42
Case No.: |
99-3199 | |
Complete Title: |
||
James Servais, Douglas Pierce, William R. Dobson, Roger Noll, Rita Noll, Byron Krueger, Melvin Schmitz, and Roger Swanson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., National Cheese Exchange, Inc., and Alpine Lace Brands, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ William R. Dobson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., and National Cheese Exchange, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ Roger Noll, Rita Noll, Byron Krueger, Melvin Schmitz, and Roger W. Swanson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., National Cheese Exchange, Inc., Borden, Inc., and Alpine Lace Brands, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. | ||
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 2001 WI App 165 Reported at: 246 Wis. 2d 920, 631 N.W.2d 629 (Published) | ||
Opinion Filed: |
April 30, 2002 | |
Submitted on Briefs: |
| |
Oral Argument: |
March 5, 2002 | |
Source of Appeal: |
||
Court: |
Circuit | |
County: |
Dane | |
Judge: |
P. Charles Jones | |
|
Justices: |
||
Concurred: |
| |
Dissented: |
| |
Not Participating: |
| |
Attorneys: |
||
For the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Michael L. Stoker and Johns & Flaherty, S.C., La Crosse, and oral argument by Thomas Dubbs.
For the defendants-respondents there were briefs by Ralph V. Topinka and Quarles & Brady, LLP, Madison; Tefft W. Smith, J. Robert Robertson, Nathaniel M. Cousins, Catherine Fazio and Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Illinois; Theodore L. Banks, Seth A. Eisner and Kraft Foods, Inc., Northfield, Illinois; Michael Fischer, G. Michael Halfenger and Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee; Howard A. Pollack and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee; Thomas F. Ryan, Bruce M. Zessar, Gabriel Aizenberg and Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Chicago, Illinois; Colleen K. Nissl and Borden, Inc., Columbus, Ohio; Scott W. Hansen, Christopher Banaszak and Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, S.C., Milwaukee; and oral argument by Tefft W. Smith.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Kevin J. O'Connor, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by James A. Buchen on behalf of Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, and William F. White and Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Utilities Association, Inc.
2002 WI 42
notice
This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
(L.C. No. |
97 CV 1212, 97 CV 1777, 97 CV 1885) | ||
STATE OF WISCONSIN : |
IN | ||
James Servais, Douglas Pierce, William R. Dobson, Roger Noll, Rita Noll, Byron Krueger, Melvin Schmitz, and Roger Swanson, Plaintiffs-Appellants- Petitioners, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., National Cheese Exchange, Inc., and Alpine Lace Brands, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ William R. Dobson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., and National Cheese Exchange, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ Roger Noll, Rita Noll, Byron Krueger, Melvin Schmitz, and Roger W. Swanson, Plaintiffs-Appellants- Petitioners, v. Kraft Foods, Inc., National Cheese Exchange, Inc., Borden, Inc., and Alpine Lace Brands, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. |
FILED APR 30, 2002 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme Court | ||
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.
¶1. PER CURIAM.This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, Servais v. Kraft Foods, 2001 WI App 165, 246 Wis.2d920, 631 N.W.2d629, that affirmed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dane County, P. Charles Jones, Judge. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed. Justices N. PATRICK CROOKS, DAVID T. PROSSER, and DIANE S. SYKES would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON and Justices WILLIAM A. BABLITCH and ANN WALSH BRADLEY would reverse. Justice JON P. WILCOX did not participate. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.