2001 WI 56
|
Case No.: 98-3139-CR |
|
Complete Title of Case: |
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant. |
|
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 2000 WI App 118 Reported at: 237 Wis. 2d 633, 614 N.W.2d 552 (Published) |
|
Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: May 2, 2001 |
|
Source of APPEAL COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Milwaukee JUDGE: Jeffrey A. Wagner |
|
JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate. |
|
ATTORNEYS: For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender. |
2001 WI 56
NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
State of Wisconsin,
Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
v.
Ondra Bond,
Defendant-Appellant.
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.
¶1. PER CURIAM.The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.
¶2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.