PER CURIAM. We review the report and recommendation of the referee, Michael F. Dubis, that Attorney Michael C. Trudgeon receive a public reprimand and bear the costs of this proceeding. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed an eight-count complaint against Attorney Trudgeon alleging professional misconduct in two client matters. Attorney Trudgeon did not file an answer.

PER CURIAM. Daniel Bero appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of exposing children to harmful material. He argues the State presented insufficient evidence to establish that he exhibited the materials to the children because he did not offer the magazines to them, but merely acquiesced in their viewing of the pornography. We reject that argument and affirm the judgment.

PER CURIAM. Adam Davis appeals a judgment convicting him of child enticement and using a computer to facilitate a sex crime. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. The issue is whether he received effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm.

LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Jeremy Trusty appeals the circuit court judgment convicting him of disorderly conduct after a jury trial. I affirm the judgment.

PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order granting Steven Krueger's motion to suppress evidence gained as the result of an investigatory stop of Krueger's vehicle. The State contends the circuit court erred by concluding the police officer lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop. We agree and therefore reverse the order.

NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Karl C. Bloecher appeals from a judgment of conviction for criminal trespass to a dwelling and misdemeanor bail jumping. Bloecher pled no contest to both offenses, but subsequently moved for postsentence plea withdrawal on grounds that: (1) he had contested the factual basis for the plea during allocution, (2) his plea was involuntary due to his subjective belief that he was the target of a police department conspiracy, and (3) the plea was invalid insofar as it was based on a defective criminal complaint. He additionally appeals from the trial court order denying his Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30 motion for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that his pleas were properly entered and he forfeited his right to challenge the complaint, we affirm the judgment and postconviction order.

PER CURIAM. Johnny Turnage appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. An important part of the record is missing, and we conclude that the record has not been adequately reconstructed to the required standard of beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, we reverse the judgment and order.

PER CURIAM. Kristin Sawotka appeals a declaratory judgment and an order dismissing her underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage case.[1] The circuit court dismissed the case after American Merchants Casualty Company paid the statutory minimum $50,000 limit after stipulating to UIM coverage in Sawotka's umbrella policy. Sawotka argues the court erroneously concluded the stipulation did not incorporate the $1,000,000 policy limit. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BRUNNER, J.[1] Rodney L. appeals a judgment adjudicating him delinquent resulting from his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver at or near a park under Wis. Stat. § 961.49(1m)(b)1. Although we conclude that law enforcement's temporary detention and protective frisk of Rodney were supported by reasonable suspicion, we hold that a second search following the initial protective frisk was unlawful. We therefore reverse the dispositional order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

PER CURIAM. Rural Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the order of the circuit court that affirmed the decision of the Labor & Industry Review Commission that Javier Ramos was permanently and totally disabled. Rural Mutual argues that the Commission erred when it made this determination because its factual findings were based on speculation and not credible evidence. Because we conclude that there was credible and substantial evidence to support the Commission's findings, we affirm.

HOOVER, P.J.[1] Nicholas DeMoe appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while intoxicated, first offense. DeMoe argues the traffic stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We reject DeMoe's argument and affirm.

PER CURIAM. Bruce Phelps appeals a judgment dismissing his adverse possession claim against Harvey and Karen Phelps. Bruce argues the circuit court erred when it concluded he did not prove he adversely occupied the disputed land. We agree. We therefore reverse and remand with directions for the circuit court to grant judgment in Bruce's favor.

PER CURIAM. Roy A. Atkins appeals from the order granting summary judgment to Michael P. Hagen d/b/a Pride of America Camping Resort and Pride of America, Inc. (hereafter "Hagen"). Pursuant to this court's order of May 29, 2009, the case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar and the parties have submitted memo briefs. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17 (2007-08).[1] We reverse the judgment of the circuit court and remand the matter to that court for proceedings consistent with this decision.