While important challenges remain for Wisconsin’s justice
system, the proposed
biennial state budget, introduced
by Gov. Jim Doyle on Feb. 17, contains several initiatives the State Bar
of Wisconsin has supported for many years. These include:
The governor also included several other noteworthy policy items that the State Bar supports, including restoring the ability of insureds to stack coverage of auto liability insurance policies, a right which the legislature eliminated in 1995. In addition, the budget proposes significant changes to the laws governing contributory negligence and joint and several liability. In general, the budget would restore the common law rules of contributory negligence and joint and several liability as they existed prior to revisions by 1995 Wisconsin Act 17. Restoring the pre-1995 law in this regard has been a long-standing position of the State Bar.
The budget news is less sanguine when it comes to funding of the criminal justice system. The budget significantly reduces funding for district attorneys, and it provides no increase for additional staff attorneys at the State Public Defender. The budget also contains no increase in the $40 per hour rate paid to private bar attorneys who take SPD cases, nor does it make whole the current deficit in the private bar appropriation used to pay private bar attorneys (the current appropriation is expected to be exhausted in April, and private bar attorneys will not be paid again until after July 1).
The governor also proposes, as he did two years ago, to consolidate certain state agency attorneys into a proposed Division of Legal Services within the Department of Administration. The new division would provide legal services to other executive branch agencies except the Department of Public Instruction and the Department of Justice. The governor also proposes creating a politically-appointed chief legal advisor – outside of the civil service system – in eight executive branch departments.
The budget also proposes the elimination of administrative hearings before the Equal Rights Division of "no probable cause" findings regarding complaints alleging discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations; violations of the family and medical leave law; state whistleblower statutes; or complaints alleging discrimination for exercising rights under public employee occupational safety and health statutes. Instead, the budget provides for review of no probable cause findings in circuit court. On February 27, the Board of Governors adopted a public policy position opposing the elimination of these no probable cause hearings before an administrative law judge.
Fortunately, the governor’s budget does not propose an expansion of the sales tax to legal or other professional services, a measure some legislators have recently advocated publicly. The State Bar’s government relations staff will continue to work with legislators to head off any efforts to insert such a tax into the budget.
The budget also contains several other items that may directly affect many State Bar members or their practice (the State Bar has not taken a position on these issues, although in some cases individual State Bar sections may have taken positions in the past):
The budget has been referred to the Joint Committee on Finance, which includes eight members from each house. Because the 2009-11 budget originated in the Assembly (as AB 75), the bill – as amended by the committee – will be considered first by that chamber and then by the Senate. Any differences between the two versions of the budget must then be resolved before final legislative approval and review by the governor. While all of this work should, in theory, be completed before the end of the 2007-09 biennium on June 30, work on past budgets has often extended beyond that date.
Link to the Bar’s Government Relations page throughout the budget process for the latest updates and links.